Department of Urology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
While the receipt of a perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) has been associated with an increased risk of mortality for a number of malignancies, the relationship between PBT and survival following radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa) has not been well established.
To evaluate the association of PBT with disease recurrence and mortality following RC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified 2060 patients who underwent RC at the Mayo Clinic between 1980 and 2005. PBT was defined as transfusion of allogenic red blood cells during RC or postoperative hospitalization.
Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and was compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the association of PBT with outcome, controlling for clinicopathologic variables.
A total of 1279 patients (62%) received PBT. The median number of units transfused was 2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-4). Patients receiving PBT were significantly older (median: 69 yr vs 66 yr; p<0.0001), had a worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p<0.0001), and were more likely to have muscle-invasive tumors (56% vs 49%; p = 0.004). Median postoperative follow-up was 10.9 yr (IQR: 7.9-15.7). Receipt of PBT was associated with significantly worse 5-yr recurrence-free survival (58% vs 64%; p = 0.01), cancer-specific survival (59% vs 72%; p<0.001), and overall survival (45% vs 63%; p<0.001). On multivariate analyses, PBT remained associated with significantly increased risks of postoperative tumor recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20; p = 0.04), death from BCa (HR: 1.31; p = 0.003), and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.27; p = 0.0002). Among patients who received PBT, an increasing number of units transfused was independently associated with increased cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.07; p<0.0001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.05; p<0.0001). Limitations include selection bias and lack of standardized transfusion criteria.
We found that PBT is associated with significantly increased risks of cancer recurrence and mortality following RC. While external validation is required, continued efforts to reduce the use of blood products in these patients are warranted.
虽然围手术期输血(PBT)与多种恶性肿瘤的死亡率增加有关,但 PBT 与膀胱癌(BCa)根治性膀胱切除术(RC)后生存之间的关系尚未得到很好的确定。
评估 PBT 与 RC 后疾病复发和死亡率的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:我们确定了 1980 年至 2005 年间在梅奥诊所接受 RC 的 2060 名患者。PBT 定义为 RC 期间或术后住院期间输注同种异体红细胞。
使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计生存情况,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估 PBT 与结局的关联,同时控制临床病理变量。
共有 1279 名患者(62%)接受了 PBT。输注的单位中位数为 2(四分位距[IQR]:2-4)。接受 PBT 的患者年龄明显较大(中位数:69 岁 vs 66 岁;p<0.0001),东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态较差(p<0.0001),且更有可能患有肌肉浸润性肿瘤(56% vs 49%;p = 0.004)。中位术后随访时间为 10.9 年(IQR:7.9-15.7)。接受 PBT 与 5 年无复发生存率显著降低相关(58% vs 64%;p = 0.01)、癌症特异性生存率降低相关(59% vs 72%;p<0.001)和总生存率降低相关(45% vs 63%;p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,PBT 与术后肿瘤复发的风险显著增加相关(风险比[HR]:1.20;p = 0.04)、BCa 死亡的风险增加相关(HR:1.31;p = 0.003)和全因死亡率增加相关(HR:1.27;p = 0.0002)。在接受 PBT 的患者中,输注的单位数量增加与癌症特异性死亡率增加(HR:1.07;p<0.0001)和全因死亡率增加(HR:1.05;p<0.0001)独立相关。局限性包括选择偏差和缺乏标准化输血标准。
我们发现 PBT 与 RC 后癌症复发和死亡率的风险显著增加相关。虽然需要外部验证,但有必要继续努力减少这些患者血液制品的使用。