Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Mar 30;214(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
Many locomotor measures commonly used to assess functional deficits following neurological injury are velocity dependent. This makes the comparison of faster pre-injury walking to slower post-injury walking a challenging process. In lieu of calculating mean values at specific velocities, we have employed the use of nonlinear regression techniques to quantify locomotor measures across all velocities. This enables us to assess more accurately the locomotor recovery of rats after a cervical spinal cord injury. For example, while the mean stride length of the hindlimbs decreased following injury, regression analysis revealed that the change was due to the reduction in walking speed and not a functional deficit. A significant difference in the percent of the right forelimb step cycle that was spent in stance phase, or duty factor, was found across all velocities, however this deficit spontaneously recovered after 6 weeks. Conversely, no differences were initially found in hindlimb stride length, but abnormal compensatory techniques were found to have developed 3 weeks after injury.
许多常用于评估神经损伤后功能缺陷的运动学测量方法都依赖于速度。这使得比较受伤前较快的行走速度和受伤后较慢的行走速度成为一项具有挑战性的工作。为了避免在特定速度下计算平均值,我们采用了非线性回归技术来量化所有速度下的运动学测量。这使我们能够更准确地评估大鼠颈脊髓损伤后的运动学恢复情况。例如,虽然后腿的平均步幅在损伤后减小,但回归分析表明,这种变化是由于行走速度的降低而不是功能缺陷造成的。在所有速度下,右侧前肢步周期中处于支撑相的比例(即负荷因子)存在显著差异,但这一缺陷在 6 周后自发恢复。相反,最初在后腿步幅上没有发现差异,但在损伤后 3 周时发现了异常的代偿技术。