Susser E S, Struening E L
Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962.
Schizophr Bull. 1990;16(1):133-45. doi: 10.1093/schbul/16.1.133.
In a survey of homeless men, the authors found that screening scales for psychotic symptoms (Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Instrument) and signs (6-item scale of observational ratings) predicted a rating of psychosis (possible, probable, or definite) on a diagnostic interview (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R: Psychotic Disorders) reasonably well, in a sample where psychosis was common. Although the two scales performed well when used in conjunction, neither scale showed adequate predictive power when used alone. The authors conclude that screening for psychotic disorders in community studies is feasible for some purposes. They suggest approaches to the use of diagnostic interviews and screening scales in future community studies that might enhance the interpretability as results as well as the efficacy of screening.
在一项针对无家可归男性的调查中,作者发现,精神病症状筛查量表(精神疾病流行病学研究工具)和体征量表(6项观察评分量表)在一个精神病较为常见的样本中,对诊断访谈(《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本结构化临床访谈:精神障碍)中精神病的评级(可能、很可能或肯定)具有较好的预测能力。尽管这两个量表联合使用时表现良好,但单独使用时均未显示出足够的预测力。作者得出结论,在社区研究中,出于某些目的对精神障碍进行筛查是可行的。他们建议在未来的社区研究中使用诊断访谈和筛查量表的方法,这可能会提高结果的可解释性以及筛查的效果。