Cochin-Broca-Hôtel Dieu University Hospital, Paris, France.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013 Feb;35(2):140-6. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0803-x.
No routine coagulation laboratory test is recommended during rivaroxaban or dabigatran treatment. However measuring drug concentration and/or anticoagulant activity can be desirable in some special clinical settings, such as bleeding, thrombosis recurrence or emergency surgery. The effects of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban on various coagulation assays have been previously studied in normal plasma spiked with increasing concentrations of the drug. In contrast, few data are available in routinely treated patients. In order to perform and to interpret the results of these tests, it is necessary to determine the usual responses of patient's plasma. We have used several coagulation tests in a prospective study including 106 patients receiving thromboprophylactic treatment with dabigatran 150 or 220 mg od and rivaroxaban 10 mg od for major orthopaedic surgery. The most common tests--prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)--give results, which vary according to the reagent used. To overcome this limitation, we advocate the use of plasma calibrators, which decreases the inter-laboratory heterogeneity of results. Anti-Xa measurement and Hemoclot, a thrombin diluted clotting assay, are specific assays which have been proposed for rivaroxaban and dabigatran respectively. These tests, conventional PT, aPTT and thrombin generation (TG) have been performed. We demonstrated that measurements of both drugs can determine reliably the drug concentration in patients' plasmas. PT is more prolonged with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran. Interestingly, the pattern of TG was clearly different in relation to the difference in the mechanism of action of the two new anticoagulants. A significant inter-individual variability of response is detected. Rivaroxaban--mean Cmax 140 ng/mL (extremes 0-412) induces a greater increase of PT than dabigatran. aPTT is sensitive to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban concentrations were in good agreement with two other studies while unexplained lower than expected concentrations were found in dabigatran patients receiving 220 mg once a day [mean Cmax 60 ng/mL (extremes 0-320)]. An interference by pantoprazole, a drug which reduces dabigatran absorption, could explain the observed lower than expected results.
在使用利伐沙班或达比加群治疗期间,不建议常规进行凝血实验室检查。然而,在某些特殊临床情况下,如出血、血栓复发或急诊手术,测量药物浓度和/或抗凝活性可能是理想的。达比加群酯和利伐沙班对不同凝血检测的影响已在正常血浆中加入递增浓度的药物进行了先前研究。相比之下,在常规治疗患者中,仅有少量数据。为了进行和解释这些检测的结果,有必要确定患者血浆的通常反应。我们在一项前瞻性研究中使用了几种凝血检测,该研究纳入了 106 例接受达比加群 150 或 220mg 每日一次或利伐沙班 10mg 每日一次预防血栓治疗的骨科大手术患者。最常用的检测——凝血酶原时间(PT)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)——结果因所用试剂而异。为了克服这一限制,我们提倡使用血浆校准品,这可降低结果的实验室间异质性。抗-Xa 测定和 Hemoclot,一种稀释凝血酶的凝血检测,分别是针对利伐沙班和达比加群提出的特异性检测。已对这些检测、常规 PT、aPTT 和凝血酶生成(TG)进行了检测。我们证明,两种药物的测量均可可靠地确定患者血浆中的药物浓度。与达比加群相比,利伐沙班使 PT 延长更明显。有趣的是,与两种新型抗凝剂作用机制的差异相对应,TG 模式明显不同。检测到个体间反应存在显著的可变性。平均 Cmax 为 140ng/mL(范围 0-412)的利伐沙班引起的 PT 升高大于达比加群。aPTT 对达比加群敏感。利伐沙班浓度与另外两项研究一致,而在接受每日一次 220mg 达比加群治疗的患者中发现了无法解释的低于预期的浓度。泮托拉唑可降低达比加群的吸收,其可能导致观察到的低于预期的结果。