Goldstein R M, Secrest C L, Klintmalm G B, Husberg B S
Transplantation Services, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75246.
Surgery. 1990 May;107(5):540-3.
Arterial inflow is essential for graft function after liver transplantation. Sometimes the recipient celiac axis is not suitable for anastomosis, and in these cases a conduit from either the aorta or iliac artery is an alternative. We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients who required arterial conduits and compared them with a matched control group who underwent standard arterial reconstruction (donor celiac artery to recipient celiac artery). The indications and surgical technique for arterial conduits are presented. There were no differences in intraoperative vascular flow studies, postoperative liver function, or incidence of rejection in the two groups. There were, however, more deaths in the conduit group, two of which are related to the retropancreatic conduit technique, with the others caused by the patients' underlying condition at transplantation. There was no morbidity or death associated with the antepancreatic conduit techniques. We therefore believe the use of arterial conduits from the aorta or iliac artery, when placed antepancreatically, are safe and should be used without reservation when indicated.
肝移植术后,动脉血供对移植物功能至关重要。有时受者腹腔干不适合进行吻合,在这些情况下,可选择使用来自主动脉或髂动脉的血管移植物。我们回顾性分析了32例需要血管移植物的患者,并将其与接受标准动脉重建(供体腹腔干至受者腹腔干)的匹配对照组进行比较。本文介绍了血管移植物的适应证和手术技术。两组术中血管血流研究、术后肝功能或排斥反应发生率无差异。然而,血管移植物组死亡人数更多,其中两例与胰后血管移植物技术有关,其他死亡原因是患者移植时的基础疾病。胰前血管移植物技术未导致任何并发症或死亡。因此,我们认为,当从主动脉或髂动脉获取的血管移植物置于胰前时,使用是安全的,有指征时应毫不犹豫地使用。