• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机应用程序测量拇外翻角度的组内和组间可靠性。

Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Torbay Hospital, Lawes Bridge, Torquay TQ2 7AA, UK.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Mar;19(1):18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2012.08.004
PMID:23337271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Measurement of radiological angles can be useful in the planning of the management of patients with hallux valgus. A smartphone application offers an alternative way of measuring these angles in a clinic setting. We compared the reliability (inter- and intra-observer) of this method to the use of PACS.

METHODS

Radiographs of 30 feet from new patients referred with hallux valgus were examined and angles (HVA, IMA, and DMAA) recorded using the smartphone application and PACS.

RESULTS

The smartphone application provided good inter-observer reliability for HVA and IMA (r=0.93 and r=0.79 respectively). Intra-observer reliability for HVA and IMA was also found to be good (r=0.93-0.97 r=0.82-0.93 respectively). The inter- and intra-observer reliability for using this method to measure DMAA fell below useful levels (r<0.60 in each case).

CONCLUSIONS

This smartphone application provides a reliable method to measure HVA and IMA but we would not recommend it to measure DMAA.

摘要

背景

放射角度的测量在拇外翻患者的管理规划中可能很有用。智能手机应用程序为在诊所环境中测量这些角度提供了一种替代方法。我们将这种方法的可靠性(观察者内和观察者间)与 PACS 的使用进行了比较。

方法

检查了 30 名新就诊的拇外翻患者的足部 X 光片,并使用智能手机应用程序和 PACS 记录了角度(HVA、IMA 和 DMAA)。

结果

智能手机应用程序在 HVA 和 IMA 方面具有良好的观察者间可靠性(r=0.93 和 r=0.79)。HVA 和 IMA 的观察者内可靠性也很好(r=0.93-0.97,r=0.82-0.93)。使用这种方法测量 DMAA 的观察者间和观察者内可靠性都低于有用水平(每种情况下 r<0.60)。

结论

该智能手机应用程序提供了一种可靠的方法来测量 HVA 和 IMA,但我们不建议使用它来测量 DMAA。

相似文献

1
Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles.智能手机应用程序测量拇外翻角度的组内和组间可靠性。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Mar;19(1):18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
2
The Effect of Incorrect Foot Placement on the Accuracy of Radiographic Measurements of the Hallux Valgus and Inter-Metatarsal Angles for Treating Hallux Valgus.不正确的足部位置对拇外翻及跖间角X线测量准确性在治疗拇外翻中的影响
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(3):196-201.
3
Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the distal metatarsal articular angle in adult hallux valgus.成人拇外翻中跖骨远端关节角的观察者内及观察者间可靠性
Foot Ankle Int. 2002 Aug;23(8):722-6. doi: 10.1177/107110070202300808.
4
Re: Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles [Foot Ankle Surg. 19 (1) (2013) 18-21].回复:用于测量拇外翻角度的智能手机应用程序的观察者间和观察者内可靠性[《足踝外科》,19(1)(2013),第18 - 21页]
Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep;19(3):206. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
Intra- and Interobserver Agreement in Hallux Valgus Angle Measurements on Weightbearing and Non-Weightbearing Radiographs.负重与非负重X线片上拇外翻角测量的观察者内及观察者间一致性
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jul;58(4):706-712. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.032.
6
Point-Connecting Measurements of the Hallux Valgus Deformity: A New Measurement and Its Clinical Application.拇外翻畸形的点连接测量:一种新的测量方法及其临床应用
Yonsei Med J. 2016 May;57(3):741-7. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.741.
7
A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones.一种利用智能手机内置照片编辑功能快速测量拇外翻参数的新方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 21;22(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04604-y.
8
Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters.拇外翻参数的手动测量与计算机辅助测量之间的比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Oct;25(10):708-11. doi: 10.1177/107110070402501003.
9
Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program.拇外翻的影像学角度:手动测量与计算机程序测量之间的差异。
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Mar;27(3):175-80. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700304.
10
Use of the iPhone for radiographic evaluation of hallux valgus.使用 iPhone 进行拇外翻的放射学评估。
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Feb;42(2):269-73. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1455-9. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Manual Measurement Device for Measuring Hallux Valgus Angle in Patients with Hallux Valgus.开发一种用于测量拇外翻患者拇外翻角的手动测量装置。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159108.
2
Cohort Comparison of Radiographic Correction and Complications Between Minimal Invasive and Open Lapidus Procedures for Hallux Valgus.微创与开放式Lapidus 手术治疗拇外翻的影像学矫正与并发症的队列比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Oct;43(10):1277-1284. doi: 10.1177/10711007221112088. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
3
Reliability of different smartphones measuring the hallux valgus parameters in a new rapid method: a follow-up study.
不同智能手机在新快速测量方法中测量拇外翻参数的可靠性:随访研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 2;23(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05217-9.
4
A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones.一种利用智能手机内置照片编辑功能快速测量拇外翻参数的新方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 21;22(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04604-y.
5
Reliability of 2 Smartphone Applications for Cobb Angle Measurement in Scoliosis.智能手机应用程序测量脊柱侧凸 Cobb 角的可靠性研究。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2021 Mar;13(1):67-70. doi: 10.4055/cios19182. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
6
Point vs. traditional method evaluation of hallux valgus: interreader reliability and intermethod performance using X-ray and MRI.拇外翻的点评估法与传统评估法:使用X射线和MRI的阅片者间可靠性及方法间性能比较
Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Feb;48(2):251-257. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3022-5. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
7
Reliability and validity of angle measurements using radiograph and smartphone applications: experimental research on protractor.使用X线片和智能手机应用程序进行角度测量的可靠性和有效性:量角器的实验研究
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Oct;29(10):1869-1873. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1869. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
8
REPRODUCIBILITY OF SCHATZKER CLASSIFICATION THROUGH SMARTPHONE APPLICATIONS.通过智能手机应用实现Schatzker分类的可重复性
Acta Ortop Bras. 2016 Nov-Dec;24(6):309-311. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220162406159078.
9
Studying Upper-Limb Kinematics Using Inertial Sensors Embedded in Mobile Phones.使用嵌入在手机中的惯性传感器研究上肢运动学
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 May 20;2(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/rehab.4101.
10
Validity and reliability of arm abduction angle measured on smartphone: a cross-sectional study.智能手机测量手臂外展角度的有效性和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 20;17:93. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0957-3.