Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Drugs. 2013 Feb;73(2):117-30. doi: 10.1007/s40265-012-0002-2.
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have become a hallmark of anaemia therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although different ESAs are available for the treatment of renal anaemia, each nephrologist should select a single ESA for an individual patient. Epoetin alfa and epoetin beta have been used 1-3 times weekly but extended-interval dosing up to every 4 weeks is also effective in a substantial majority of CKD patients. However, the epoetin dose necessary to achieve or maintain target haemoglobin (Hb) levels increases substantially as the dosing interval increases. Subcutaneous administration of short-acting ESAs is more effective than the intravenous route of administration. Darbepoetin alfa and the continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) have been developed as a treatment for anaemia with extended administration intervals (every 2 weeks and every 4 weeks, respectively). Dose requirements for these long-acting ESAs are independent of the route of administration. Patents of short-acting ESAs have expired, which has opened the field for biosimilars. Epoetin biosimilars approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) or the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have been shown to have a comparable efficacy and safety profile to their originators. An alarming increase in pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) in Thailand with follow-on epoetins manufactured in Asia (but also those manufactured in Latin America) indicates that stringent country-specific approval and pharmacovigilance protocols for ESAs manufactured in non-North American and non-EU European countries are urgently needed. Two PRCA cases occurring with subcutaneous HX575 (one certain, one likely) indicate that chances of inducing a more immunogenic product are unpredictable, even with a biosimilar epoetin approved under the EMA biosimilar approval pathway. Phase III clinical trials with peginesatide, a pegylated synthetic peptide-based ESA without any homology to erythropoietin raised safety concerns in non-dialysis CKD patients but not in dialysis patients.
促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESAs)已成为慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者贫血治疗的标志。虽然有不同的 ESA 可用于治疗肾性贫血,但每位肾病学家都应选择单一的 ESA 用于个体患者。促红素阿尔法和促红素贝塔每周使用 1-3 次,但延长间隔剂量至每 4 周也对大多数 CKD 患者有效。然而,随着给药间隔的增加,达到或维持目标血红蛋白(Hb)水平所需的促红素剂量大大增加。短效 ESA 的皮下给药比静脉给药更有效。达贝泊汀阿尔法和持续红细胞生成素受体激动剂(CERA)已被开发用于延长给药间隔(分别为每 2 周和每 4 周)的贫血治疗。这些长效 ESA 的剂量要求与给药途径无关。短效 ESA 的专利已经过期,这为生物类似药开辟了领域。已批准的欧洲药品管理局(EMA)或美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的促红素生物类似药已被证明与它们的原研药具有相似的疗效和安全性。亚洲生产的后续促红素(也包括拉丁美洲生产的促红素)在泰国引起的纯红细胞再生障碍性贫血(PRCA)急剧增加表明,迫切需要针对非北美和非欧盟欧洲国家生产的 ESA 制定严格的国家特定批准和药物警戒协议。皮下注射 HX575 引起的 2 例 PRCA(1 例肯定,1 例可能)表明,即使是经过 EMA 生物类似药批准途径批准的促红素生物类似药,也无法预测诱导更免疫原性产品的可能性。聚乙二醇化合成肽基 ESA peginesatide 的 III 期临床试验在非透析 CKD 患者中引起了安全性担忧,但在透析患者中没有引起担忧。