提高对观察性研究的信心：统计分析计划是否应公开？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?

作者信息

Onukwugha Eberechukwu

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Mar;31(3):177-9. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0019-0.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-012-0019-0

PMID:23338964

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?提高对观察性研究的信心：统计分析计划是否应公开？

Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Mar;31(3):177-9. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0019-0.

The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.统计分析计划在观察性研究中的价值：从一开始就定义高质量研究。

JAMA. 2012 Aug 22;308(8):773-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9502.

Specifying a Conceptual Treatment Choice Relationship Before Analysis Is Necessary for Comparative Effectiveness Research.在进行比较效果研究之前明确概念性治疗选择关系是必要的。

Med Care. 2017 Feb;55(2):94-96. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000616.

The architecture of clinical research (From the "Biostatistics and Epidemiology Lecture Series, Part 1").临床研究的架构（源自“生物统计学与流行病学系列讲座，第1部分”）

Cleve Clin J Med. 2017 Sep;84(9 Suppl 2):e2-e9. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.84.s2.02.

On the limitations of comparative effectiveness research.论比较效果研究的局限性。

Stat Med. 2010 Aug 30;29(19):1991-5; discussion 1996-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.3960.

Statistics in Brief: An Introduction to the Use of Propensity Scores.简要统计学：倾向得分应用简介

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2722-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4239-4. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

Observational human studies in allergic diseases: design concepts and highlights of recent National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-funded research.过敏性疾病的人体观察性研究：设计概念及美国国立过敏与传染病研究所近期资助研究的要点

Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Apr;20(2):208-214. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000620.

Challenges of Assessing Therapeutic or Diagnostic Outcomes with Observational Data.利用观察性数据评估治疗或诊断结果的挑战。

Am J Med. 2018 Feb;131(2):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

Statistical and clinical interpretation of research results.研究结果的统计学与临床解读。

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr;97(2):165-70. doi: 10.7547/0970165.

Revisiting issues, drawbacks and opportunities with observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.重新审视比较有效性研究中观察性研究的问题、局限性和机遇。

J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;19(4):579-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01802.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies.观察性研究的 DEBATE 统计分析计划。

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0879-5.

The efficacy of activated protein C for the treatment of sepsis: incorporating observational evidence with a Bayesian approach.活化蛋白C治疗脓毒症的疗效：采用贝叶斯方法整合观察性证据

BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 16;5(1):e006524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006524.

本文引用的文献

JAMA. 2012 Aug 22;308(8):773-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9502.

Circulation: cardiovascular quality and outcomes annual report, 2012.《循环：心血管质量与结局年度报告，2012 年》

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jul 1;5(4):e28-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967653.

Should preregistration of epidemiologic study protocols become compulsory? Reflections and a counterproposal.流行病学研究方案的预注册应成为强制要求吗？思考与一项反建议。

Epidemiology. 2012 Mar;23(2):184-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318245c05b.

Registration of observational studies does not enhance validity.观察性研究的注册并不能提高其有效性。

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Nov;90(5):646-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.199.

Registration of protocols for observational research is unnecessary and would do more harm than good.观察性研究方案的注册没有必要，而且弊大于利。

Occup Environ Med. 2011 Feb;68(2):86-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.058917. Epub 2010 Nov 29.

Preregistration of study protocols is unlikely to improve the yield from our science, but other strategies might.研究方案的预先注册不太可能提高我们科研的产出，但其他策略或许可以。

Epidemiology. 2010 Sep;21(5):612-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e9bba6.

The registration of observational studies--when metaphors go bad.观察性研究的注册——当隐喻失灵时。

Epidemiology. 2010 Sep;21(5):607-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181eafbcf.

Registration of observational studies: is it time?观察性研究的注册：是时候了吗？

CMAJ. 2010 Oct 19;182(15):1638-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092252. Epub 2010 Jul 19.

Strengthening the reliability and credibility of observational epidemiology studies by creating an Observational Studies Register.通过建立观察性研究注册处来增强观察性流行病学研究的可靠性和可信度。

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 May;64(5):481-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.009.

GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness.GRACE 原则：识别高质量的比较有效性观察性研究。

Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jun;16(6):467-71.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验