• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察性研究的注册并不能提高其有效性。

Registration of observational studies does not enhance validity.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Nov;90(5):646-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.199.

DOI:10.1038/clpt.2011.199
PMID:22012311
Abstract

Mandatory registration of observational studies has been proposed to enhance quality of published research and reduce selective publication of positive findings. Enhanced communication of study plans would be welcome, but the alleged benefits to research quality are illusory. In particular, prespecification of hypotheses has no independent effect on data quality or the likelihood that hypotheses are correct. Registration of studies and hypotheses is likely to be misinterpreted as an independent determinant of validity.

摘要

已经有人提议对观察性研究进行强制性注册,以提高已发表研究的质量并减少对阳性研究结果的选择性发表。人们欢迎更有效地交流研究计划,但据称对研究质量的好处是虚幻的。特别是,假设的预先指定对数据质量或假设正确的可能性没有独立影响。对研究和假设的注册可能被误解为有效性的独立决定因素。

相似文献

1
Registration of observational studies does not enhance validity.观察性研究的注册并不能提高其有效性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Nov;90(5):646-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.199.
2
Prevention of false positive findings in observational studies: registration will not work but replication might.观察性研究中假阳性结果的预防:注册无效,但重复研究可能有效。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Feb;65(2):95-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.125252. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
3
Reducing publication bias through trial registration.通过试验注册减少发表偏倚。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1434-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000266557.11064.2a.
4
[Without registration, no publishing!].未经注册,不得发表!
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Apr 16;129(8):733. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.08E1.
5
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, The Bone & Joint Journal, and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research require prospective registration of randomised clinical trials*: why is this important?《骨与关节外科杂志》《骨与关节杂志》以及《临床骨科学及相关研究》要求对随机临床试验进行前瞻性注册*:为何这一点很重要?
Bone Joint J. 2016 Dec;98-B(12):1571-1572. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.38081.
6
The need to improve the quality of scientific manuscripts published in Nigerian biomedical journals.提高在尼日利亚生物医学期刊上发表的科学稿件质量的必要性。
West Afr J Med. 2007 Apr-Jun;26(2):160.
7
Peer review should continue after publication.同行评审应在发表后继续进行。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;149(3):359-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.11.015.
8
[Publication of clinical trials in scientific journals: editorial issues].[科学期刊上临床试验的发表:编辑问题]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006 Nov;59(11):1206-14.
9
[Transparency in clinical research: registration of clinical trials and publication of results].[临床研究的透明度:临床试验注册与结果发表]
Med Clin (Barc). 2012 Dec 1;139(13):593-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
10
Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!临床研究设计与报告:总有改进的空间!
Transfusion. 2007 Jan;47(1):2-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01085.x.

引用本文的文献

1
DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies.观察性研究的 DEBATE 统计分析计划。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0879-5.
2
Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?提高对观察性研究的信心:统计分析计划是否应公开?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Mar;31(3):177-9. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0019-0.