National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Akadeemia tee 23, Tallinn, Estonia.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2013 Mar 18;26(3):356-67. doi: 10.1021/tx300467d. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
A suite of eight tentatively oxidative stress response-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 single-gene mutants (sod1Δ, sod2Δ, yap1Δ, cta1Δ, ctt1Δ, gsh1Δ, glr1Δ, and ccs1Δ) and one copper-vulnerable mutant (cup2Δ) was used to elucidate weather the toxicity of CuO nanoparticles to S. cerevisiae is mediated by oxidative stress (OS). Specifically, sensitivity profiles of mutants' phenotypes and wild-type (wt) upon exposure to nano-CuO were compared. As controls, CuSO4 (solubility), bulk-CuO (size), H2O2, and menadione (OS) were used. Growth inhibition of wt and mutant strains was studied in rich YPD medium and cell viability in deionized water (DI). Dissolved Cu-ions were quantified by recombinant metal-sensing bacteria and chemical analysis. To wt strain nano-CuO was 32-fold more toxic than bulk-CuO: 24-h IC50 4.8 and 155 mg/L in DI and 643 and >20000 mg/L in YPD, respectively. In toxicant-free YPD medium, all mutants had practically similar growth patterns as wt. However, the mutant strains sod1Δ, sod2Δ, ccs1Δ, and yap1Δ showed up to 12-fold elevated sensitivity toward OS standard chemicals menadione and H2O2 but not to nano-CuO, indicating that CuO nanoparticles exerted toxicity to yeast cells via different mechanisms. The most vulnerable strain to all studied Cu compounds was the copper stress response-deficient strain cup2Δ (∼16-fold difference with wt), indicating that the toxic effect of CuO (nano)particles proceeds via dissolved Cu-ions. The dissolved copper solely explained the toxicity of nano-CuO in DI but not in YPD. Assumingly, in YPD nano-CuO acquired a coating of peptides/proteins and sorbed onto the yeast's outer surface, resulting in their increased solubility in the close vicinity of yeast cells and increased uptake of Cu-ions that was not registered by the assays used for the analysis of dissolved Cu-ions in the test medium. Lastly, as yeast retained its viability in DI even by 24th hour of incubation, the profiling of the acute basal toxicity of chemicals toward yeasts may be conducted in DI.
使用一套八个暂定氧化应激反应缺陷酿酒酵母 BY4741 单基因突变体(sod1Δ、sod2Δ、yap1Δ、cta1Δ、ctt1Δ、gsh1Δ、glr1Δ 和 ccs1Δ)和一个铜易损突变体(cup2Δ)来阐明氧化铜纳米颗粒对酿酒酵母的毒性是否由氧化应激(OS)介导。具体来说,比较了突变体表型和野生型(wt)在暴露于纳米-CuO 时的敏感性谱。作为对照,使用了 CuSO4(溶解度)、块状-CuO(尺寸)、H2O2 和 Menadione(OS)。在丰富的 YPD 培养基中研究了 wt 和突变菌株的生长抑制作用,并在去离子水中(DI)研究了细胞活力。通过重组金属感应细菌和化学分析定量测定溶解的 Cu 离子。与块状-CuO 相比,wt 菌株对纳米-CuO 的毒性高 32 倍:在 DI 中的 24 小时 IC50 为 4.8 和 155mg/L,在 YPD 中的 643 和>20000mg/L。在无毒的 YPD 培养基中,所有突变体与 wt 具有几乎相同的生长模式。然而,sod1Δ、sod2Δ、ccs1Δ 和 yap1Δ 等突变菌株对 OS 标准化学品 Menadione 和 H2O2 的敏感性提高了 12 倍,但对纳米-CuO 却没有,表明氧化铜纳米颗粒通过不同的机制对酵母细胞产生毒性。对所有研究的 Cu 化合物最敏感的菌株是铜应激反应缺陷菌株 cup2Δ(与 wt 相比约 16 倍),表明 CuO(纳米)颗粒的毒性作用是通过溶解的 Cu 离子进行的。在 DI 中,仅溶解的铜就可以解释纳米-CuO 的毒性,但在 YPD 中则不然。可以假设,在 YPD 中,纳米-CuO 获得了肽/蛋白质的涂层,并吸附在酵母的外表面上,导致其在酵母细胞附近的溶解度增加,以及未被用于分析测试介质中溶解 Cu 离子的测定方法所检测到的 Cu 离子的摄取增加。最后,由于酵母在 DI 中甚至在孵育 24 小时后仍保持活力,因此可以在 DI 中对化学品对酵母的急性基础毒性进行分析。