Perfecto Ivette, Vandermeer John
School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Environ Entomol. 2013 Feb;42(1):38-48. doi: 10.1603/EN12107.
Competition has been recognized as a major organizing process in ant communities, with ant communities frequently forming spatial mosaics of dominant species associated with subdominants. Often, species exhibit tradeoffs in their ability to discover versus dominate resources, suggesting a mechanism for coexistence. Here we describe spatial patterns of dominant ants in two sites within a coffee plantation. Ants were sampled for three consecutive years by using tuna baits set on a grid on the ground and on coffee bushes. In addition, so as to determine which species discovered baits first and which species dominated baits, a separate experiment was set up where baits were observed every minute for 2 hr. The relative abundance of species followed a power law, with coefficients of determination ranging from 92 to 97% explanation. At site I the terrestrial community is dominated by two species, Pheidole synanthropica Longino and Pheidole protensa Wilson, whereas at site II the community exhibits codominance of four species: P. synanthropica, P. protensa, Solenopsis geminata F., and Pheidole 1 group. The spatial pattern formed by these species is distinct for each of the sites, both in terms of generalized appearance and dynamic stability. The terrestrial foraging ants at site I do not maintain a fixed mosaic over time. In contrast, at site II ants maintain a fixed mosaic. The arboreally foraging ants reflect, to some extent, the pattern of the terrestrial foragers. A possible interpretation of these results is that dominant ants at site I contain competitive intransitivities that generate a changing mosaic, whereas dominant ants in site II are organized in a competitive hierarchy that generates a fixed mosaic.
竞争被认为是蚂蚁群落中的一个主要组织过程,蚂蚁群落经常形成优势物种与次优势物种相关联的空间镶嵌体。通常,物种在发现资源与主导资源的能力上表现出权衡,这暗示了一种共存机制。在这里,我们描述了咖啡种植园内两个地点优势蚂蚁的空间模式。通过在地面和咖啡灌木丛上的网格中设置金枪鱼诱饵,连续三年对蚂蚁进行采样。此外,为了确定哪些物种首先发现诱饵以及哪些物种主导诱饵,还设置了一个单独的实验,在2小时内每分钟观察一次诱饵。物种的相对丰度遵循幂律,决定系数的解释范围为92%至97%。在地点I,地面群落由两个物种主导,即长颚菲氏蚁(Pheidole synanthropica Longino)和普罗滕萨菲氏蚁(Pheidole protensa Wilson),而在地点II,群落表现出四个物种的共显性:长颚菲氏蚁、普罗滕萨菲氏蚁、双齿多刺蚁(Solenopsis geminata F.)和菲氏蚁1组。这些物种形成的空间模式在每个地点都不同,无论是在总体外观还是动态稳定性方面。地点I的地面觅食蚂蚁不会随着时间维持固定的镶嵌体。相比之下,地点II的蚂蚁维持着固定的镶嵌体。在树上觅食的蚂蚁在一定程度上反映了地面觅食蚂蚁的模式。对这些结果的一种可能解释是,地点I的优势蚂蚁存在竞争非传递性,从而产生不断变化的镶嵌体,而地点II的优势蚂蚁则以竞争等级组织起来,产生固定的镶嵌体。