Eddy A C, Nance D R, Goldman M A, Caldwell D M, Copass M, Verrier E D, Carrico C J
Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Am J Surg. 1990 May;159(5):500-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81255-3.
Rupture of the thoracic aorta associated with blunt trauma remains a frequently lethal injury. Although increasing numbers of patients with ruptured aortas are surviving to reach the hospital, the in-hospital mortality attending this injury remains high. Death due to transected aorta has been related to a delay in diagnosis. In an attempt to decrease the time necessary for diagnosis of this injury, we studied 50 patients using intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) and conventional biplane angiography. We found that IVDSA was significantly faster than conventional biplane angiography, and that when IVDSA films are of diagnostic quality, they are sufficient to reliably demonstrate the presence of traumatic aortic transection. Our study was too small to establish whether IVDSA is a sufficiently sensitive test to exclude aortic injury. Further studies in this area need to be performed.
钝性创伤相关的胸主动脉破裂仍然是一种常致命的损伤。尽管越来越多的主动脉破裂患者能够存活至医院,但这种损伤的院内死亡率仍然很高。主动脉横断导致的死亡与诊断延迟有关。为了缩短诊断该损伤所需的时间,我们对50例患者进行了静脉数字减影血管造影(IVDSA)和传统双平面血管造影研究。我们发现IVDSA比传统双平面血管造影明显更快,并且当IVDSA影像具有诊断质量时,它们足以可靠地显示创伤性主动脉横断的存在。我们的研究规模太小,无法确定IVDSA是否是排除主动脉损伤的足够敏感的检查。需要在该领域进行进一步研究。