Eddy A C, Nance D R, Goldman M A, Caldwell D M, Copass M, Verrier E D, Carrico C J
Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Am J Surg. 1990 May;159(5):500-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81255-3.
Rupture of the thoracic aorta associated with blunt trauma remains a frequently lethal injury. Although increasing numbers of patients with ruptured aortas are surviving to reach the hospital, the in-hospital mortality attending this injury remains high. Death due to transected aorta has been related to a delay in diagnosis. In an attempt to decrease the time necessary for diagnosis of this injury, we studied 50 patients using intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) and conventional biplane angiography. We found that IVDSA was significantly faster than conventional biplane angiography, and that when IVDSA films are of diagnostic quality, they are sufficient to reliably demonstrate the presence of traumatic aortic transection. Our study was too small to establish whether IVDSA is a sufficiently sensitive test to exclude aortic injury. Further studies in this area need to be performed.