Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, Queens Building, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jan 22;10(1):417-42. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10010417.
With increasing interest in the use of urban green space to promote human health, there is a need to understand the extent to which park users conceptualize these places as a resource for health and well-being. This study sought to examine park users' own reasons for and benefits from green space usage and compare these with concepts and constructs in existing person-environment-health theories and models of health. Conducted in 13 public green spaces in Sheffield, UK, we undertook a qualitative content analysis of 312 park users' responses to open-ended interview questions and identified a breadth, depth and salience of visit motivators and derived effects. Findings highlight a discrepancy between reasons for visiting and derived effects from the use of urban green space. Motivations emphasized walking, green space qualities, and children. Derived effects highlighted relaxation, positive emotions within the self and towards the place, and spiritual well-being. We generate a taxonomy of motivations and derived effects that could facilitate operationalization within empirical research and articulate a conceptual framework linking motivators to outcomes for investigating green space as a resource for human health and well-being.
随着人们对利用城市绿地促进人类健康的兴趣日益浓厚,有必要了解公园使用者在何种程度上将这些地方视为健康和福祉的资源。本研究旨在探讨公园使用者使用绿地的自身原因和益处,并将这些原因和益处与现有人与环境健康理论和健康模型中的概念和结构进行比较。该研究在英国谢菲尔德的 13 个公共绿地进行,我们对 312 名公园使用者对开放式访谈问题的回答进行了定性内容分析,确定了访问动机和衍生影响的广度、深度和显著程度。研究结果突出了游览城市绿地的原因和衍生影响之间的差异。动机强调了散步、绿地质量和儿童。衍生影响则强调了放松、自我和对环境的积极情绪以及精神幸福感。我们提出了一个动机和衍生影响的分类法,这可以促进实证研究中的操作化,并阐明一个概念框架,将动机与作为人类健康和福祉资源的绿地的结果联系起来。