Chief of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regions Hospital, University of Minnesota, 640 Jackson Street, St Paul, MN, 55101, USA,
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Mar;6(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s12178-012-9151-x.
Over the past decade, there has been an increased interest in understanding the operative indications and techniques in treating scapular fractures and tracking their outcomes. Multiple studies have documented poor functional outcomes following nonoperative management of displaced scapular fractures. There is a groundswell of recognition that severe deformity from scapular malunion is associated with functional consequences for patients. This has led to a growing recognition that scapular fractures should be held to the same standards as other bodily fractures with regard to fracture fixation principles, including anatomic articular reduction, proper alignment, and stable internal fixation. Through research, there has been an improved understanding of scapular fracture patterns and the relevant surgical approaches and exposures used for fracture fixation. As with many bones, however, there still remains the absence of a compelling study that defines thresholds for surgical indication based on degrees of deformity and amounts of displacement.
在过去的十年中,人们越来越关注理解肩胛骨折的手术适应证和技术,并对其治疗结果进行跟踪研究。多项研究记录了保守治疗移位肩胛骨折的不良功能结果。人们普遍认识到,肩胛畸形愈合导致的严重畸形与患者的功能后果有关。这导致人们越来越认识到,肩胛骨折应该像其他身体骨折一样,遵循骨折固定原则,包括解剖关节复位、正确的对线和稳定的内固定。通过研究,人们对肩胛骨折模式以及用于骨折固定的相关手术入路和暴露有了更好的理解。然而,与许多骨骼一样,仍然缺乏一项有说服力的研究来根据畸形程度和移位量来确定手术适应证的阈值。