Discipline of Medical Imaging, Department of Imaging and Applied Physics, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987 Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia.
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2012 Dec;9(4):349-54. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2012.06291.
The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score has been shown to predict future cardiac events. However the extent to which the added value of a CAC score to the diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is unclear. The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation between CAC score and SPECT in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
A retrospective review of the CAC scores by use of the Agatston calcium scoring method and cardiac SPECT diagnostic reports was conducted in 48 patients, who underwent both coronary computed tomography (CT) and SPECT examinations due to suspected coronary artery disease. A Pearson correlation test was used to determine the relation between CAC scores and MPI-SPECT assessments with regard to the evaluation of the extent of disease.
Forty-seven percent of the patients had CAC scores more than 100, while 42% of these patients demonstrated abnormal, or probably abnormal, MPI-SPECT. Of the 23% of patients with a zero CAC score, only 7% had normal MPI-SPECT findings. No significant correlation was found between the CAC scores and MPI-SPECT assessments (r value ranged from 0.012 to 0.080), regardless of the degree of coronary calcification.
There is a lack of correlation between the CAC scores and the MPI-SPECT findings in the assessment of the extent of coronary artery disease. CAC scores and MPI-SPECT should be considered complementary approaches in the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分已被证明可预测未来的心脏事件。然而,CAC 评分对单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)心肌灌注成像(MPI)诊断性能的增值程度尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 CAC 评分与疑似冠心病患者 SPECT 之间的相关性。
回顾性分析 48 例因疑似冠心病而行冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CT)和 SPECT 检查的患者的 CAC 评分,采用 Agatston 钙评分法和心脏 SPECT 诊断报告。采用 Pearson 相关检验来确定 CAC 评分与 MPI-SPECT 评估之间与疾病程度评估相关的关系。
47%的患者 CAC 评分大于 100,而其中 42%的患者 MPI-SPECT 检查结果异常或可能异常。在 CAC 评分 0 的 23%患者中,只有 7%的 MPI-SPECT 检查结果正常。无论冠状动脉钙化程度如何,CAC 评分与 MPI-SPECT 评估之间均无显著相关性(r 值范围为 0.012 至 0.080)。
在评估冠状动脉疾病的程度时,CAC 评分与 MPI-SPECT 检查结果之间缺乏相关性。在评估疑似冠心病患者时,CAC 评分和 MPI-SPECT 应被视为互补的方法。