• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗激素依赖或抵抗型局灶节段性肾小球硬化症:一项随机对照试验。

Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide in steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 2013;37(1):84-90. doi: 10.1159/000346256. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1159/000346256
PMID:23343906
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) were prospectively examined in steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven FSGS were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: CTX and TAC. Patients treated with CTX (0.5-0.75 g/m(2)·month, i.v.) received prednisone at 0.8 mg/kg·day, while patients treated with TAC (0.1 mg/kg·day) received prednisone at 0.5 mg/kg·day. The plasma concentration of TAC was monitored and maintained at 5-10 ng/ml. After a 6-month treatment the patients were evaluated. Patients with complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) continued the treatment for 12 months with the dose tapered, whereas the patients with no response were excluded from the study and underwent an alternative treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were recruited and 27 completed the 12-month follow-up. The TAC-treated patients (n = 15) showed a quick remission. The initial remission time averaged 1.23 ± 0.21 versus 2.21 ± 0.77 months in the CTX group (n = 18), but no significant difference was achieved (p > 0.05). At 6 months, the two groups showed a similar outcome. Ten patients from each group showed remission (7 CR and 3 PR). At 12 months, the CTX group had 9 CR and 3 PR while the TAC group had 6 CR and 5 PR. Remission rates in TAC tended to be higher than that in CTX, but there was no difference. CTX patients had a high prevalence of infections (50.0 vs. 13.3% in TAC, p < 0.05). In contrast, TAC-treated patients showed a high incidence of hyperglycemia (26.7 vs. 0.0% in CTX, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that CTX and TAC had a similar efficacy in steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant FSGS as manifested by reduced proteinuria, improved serum albumin level and renal function.

摘要

背景

在激素依赖性或激素抵抗性局灶节段性肾小球硬化症(FSGS)患者中,前瞻性地评估了他克莫司(TAC)和环磷酰胺(CTX)的疗效和安全性。

方法

入组经活检证实为 FSGS 的患者,并将其随机分为两组:CTX 组和 TAC 组。CTX 组患者(每月 0.5-0.75g/m²,静脉注射)接受泼尼松龙 0.8mg/kg·d,而 TAC 组患者(0.1mg/kg·d)接受泼尼松龙 0.5mg/kg·d。监测 TAC 的血药浓度并维持在 5-10ng/ml。治疗 6 个月后对患者进行评估。完全缓解(CR)和部分缓解(PR)的患者继续接受 12 个月的治疗,剂量逐渐减少,而无反应的患者则被排除在研究之外,并接受替代治疗。

结果

共纳入 33 例患者,27 例完成 12 个月随访。TAC 治疗组(n=15)患者缓解迅速。初始缓解时间平均为 1.23±0.21 个月,而 CTX 组(n=18)为 2.21±0.77 个月,但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。6 个月时,两组的结果相似。每组各有 10 例患者缓解(7 例 CR 和 3 例 PR)。12 个月时,CTX 组 9 例 CR 和 3 例 PR,TAC 组 6 例 CR 和 5 例 PR。TAC 组的缓解率似乎高于 CTX 组,但差异无统计学意义。CTX 组感染发生率较高(50.0%比 TAC 组的 13.3%,p<0.05)。相比之下,TAC 治疗组患者发生高血糖的比例较高(26.7%比 CTX 组的 0.0%,p<0.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,CTX 和 TAC 在激素依赖性和激素抵抗性 FSGS 中的疗效相似,表现为蛋白尿减少、血清白蛋白水平和肾功能改善。

相似文献

1
Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide in steroid-dependent or steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗激素依赖或抵抗型局灶节段性肾小球硬化症:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Nephrol. 2013;37(1):84-90. doi: 10.1159/000346256. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
2
Tacrolimus versus intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide therapy in Chinese adults with steroid-resistant idiopathic minimal change nephropathy: a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized cohort trial.他克莫司与静脉注射环磷酰胺治疗中国成人激素耐药性特发性膜性肾病的多中心、开放标签、非随机队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2012 May;34(5):1112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
3
Tacrolimus therapy in adults with steroid- and cyclophosphamide-resistant nephrotic syndrome and normal or mildly reduced GFR.他克莫司治疗对类固醇和环磷酰胺耐药的成人肾病综合征且肾小球滤过率正常或轻度降低者。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Jul;54(1):51-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.02.018. Epub 2009 May 5.
4
Treatment of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults with tacrolimus monotherapy.他克莫司单药治疗成人局灶节段性肾小球硬化症
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Dec;19(12):3062-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh536. Epub 2004 Oct 26.
5
Tacrolimus: a new therapy for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children.他克莫司:儿童类固醇抵抗型肾病综合征的一种新疗法。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Mar;23(3):910-3. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm688. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
6
Tacrolimus therapy in adult-onset steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome due to a focal segmental glomerulosclerosis single-center experience.他克莫司治疗成人起病的局灶节段性肾小球硬化所致激素抵抗型肾病综合征:单中心经验
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Oct;29(10):1918-24. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu097. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
7
Tacrolimus as a steroid-sparing agent for adults with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome.他克莫司作为一种用于依赖类固醇的成人微小病变型肾病综合征患者的类固醇替代药物。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Jun;23(6):1919-25. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm637. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
8
Early initiation of tacrolimus or cyclophosphamide therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy with severe proteinuria.对于伴有严重蛋白尿的特发性膜性肾病,早期启动他克莫司或环磷酰胺治疗。
J Nephrol. 2008 Jul-Aug;21(4):584-91.
9
Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide as treatment for diffuse proliferative or membranous lupus nephritis: a non-randomized prospective cohort study.他克莫司与环磷酰胺治疗弥漫性增生性或膜性狼疮肾炎:一项非随机前瞻性队列研究。
Lupus. 2012 Aug;21(9):1025-35. doi: 10.1177/0961203312448105. Epub 2012 May 8.
10
Combination of immunosuppressive agents in treatment of steroid-resistant minimal change disease and primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.免疫抑制剂联合治疗激素抵抗型微小病变病和原发性局灶节段性肾小球硬化症。
Ren Fail. 2005;27(5):523-30. doi: 10.1080/08860220500198623.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children.儿童特发性类固醇抵抗性肾病综合征的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 8;5(5):CD003594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003594.pub7.
2
RGD-HSA-TAC nanoparticles targeted delivery of tacrolimus and attenuation of podocyte injury in diabetic kidney disease.RGD-人血清白蛋白-他克莫司纳米粒靶向递送他克莫司并减轻糖尿病肾病中的足细胞损伤
J Nanobiotechnology. 2025 Feb 4;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03108-4.
3
Efficacy and safety of nine immunosuppressive agents for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.
九种免疫抑制剂治疗成人原发性局灶节段性肾小球硬化症的疗效与安全性:一项成对和网状荟萃分析
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2438861. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2438861. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
4
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Assessing the Risk of Relapse.局灶节段性肾小球硬化:评估复发风险
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Sep 9;8(11):2403-2415. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.08.035. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
[Diagnosis and treatment of focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis-2023].[局灶节段性肾小球硬化症的诊断与治疗 - 2023年]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Aug;135(Suppl 5):638-647. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02260-x. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
6
Rituximab in the treatment of primary FSGS: time for its use in routine clinical practice?利妥昔单抗治疗原发性局灶节段性肾小球硬化:是时候将其应用于常规临床实践了吗?
Clin Kidney J. 2023 May 24;16(8):1199-1205. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad122. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.免疫抑制治疗在原发性局灶节段性肾小球硬化中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Kidney Med. 2022 Jun 11;4(8):100501. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100501. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Therapeutic apheresis in kidney diseases: an updated review.肾脏病的治疗性血液净化:更新综述。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):842-857. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2073892.
9
Efficacy and Safety of ACE Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Therapies in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂疗法在原发性局灶节段性肾小球硬化治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Kidney Med. 2022 Mar 24;4(5):100457. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100457. eCollection 2022 May.
10
Interventions for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults.成人局灶节段性肾小球硬化的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 28;2(2):CD003233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003233.pub3.