Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Sep;30(9):529-36. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835df608.
There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal timing for tracheal extubation in children at increased risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events, particularly following adenotonsillectomy.
To assess the occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in children undergoing elective adenotonsillectomy extubated under deep anaesthesia or when fully awake.
Prospective, randomised controlled trial.
Tertiary paediatric hospital.
One hundred children (<16 years), with at least one risk factor for perioperative respiratory adverse events (current or recent upper respiratory tract infection in the past 2 weeks, eczema, wheezing in the past 12 months, dry nocturnal cough, wheezing on exercise, family history of asthma, eczema or hay fever as well as passive smoking).
Deep or awake extubation.
The occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events (laryngospasm, bronchospasm, persistent coughing, airway obstruction, desaturation <95%).
There were no differences between the two groups with regard to age, medical and surgical parameters. The overall incidence of complications did not differ between the two groups; tracheal extubation in fully awake children was associated with a greater incidence of persistent coughing (60 vs. 35%, P = 0.028), whereas the incidence of airway obstruction relieved by simple airway manoeuvres in children extubated while deeply anaesthetised was greater (26 vs. 8%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in the incidence of oxygen desaturation lasting more than 10 s.
There was no difference in the overall incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Both extubation techniques may be used in high-risk children undergoing adenotonsillectomy provided that the child is monitored closely in the postoperative period.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000387224.
对于围手术期呼吸不良事件风险增加的儿童,特别是在接受腺样体扁桃体切除术之后,气管拔管的最佳时机仍存在争议。
评估在深度麻醉或完全清醒时对接受择期腺样体扁桃体切除术的儿童进行气管拔管时,围手术期呼吸不良事件的发生情况。
前瞻性、随机对照试验。
三级儿科医院。
100 名儿童(<16 岁),至少存在一个围手术期呼吸不良事件的风险因素(过去 2 周内有当前或近期上呼吸道感染、湿疹、过去 12 个月内有喘息、夜间干咳、运动时喘息、哮喘、湿疹或花粉热家族史以及被动吸烟)。
深度麻醉或清醒拔管。
围手术期呼吸不良事件(喉痉挛、支气管痉挛、持续咳嗽、气道阻塞、饱和度<95%)的发生情况。
两组在年龄、医疗和手术参数方面无差异。两组并发症的总体发生率无差异;完全清醒拔管的儿童持续性咳嗽发生率更高(60%比 35%,P = 0.028),而深度麻醉拔管的儿童需要通过简单的气道操作缓解气道阻塞的发生率更高(26%比 8%,P = 0.03)。无 10 秒以上的氧饱和度下降的发生率差异。
围手术期呼吸不良事件的总体发生率无差异。两种拔管技术都可用于高危儿童的腺样体扁桃体切除术,只要术后密切监测患儿。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心:ACTRN12609000387224。