• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: systematic review protocol.哮喘随机对照试验的报告质量：系统评价方案
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Mar;22(1):PS1-8. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00003.
2
The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: a systematic review.哮喘随机对照试验的报告质量：一项系统评价。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Dec;22(4):417-24. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00089.
3
Interventions for escalation of therapy for acute exacerbations of asthma in children: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.儿童哮喘急性加重期治疗升级的干预措施：Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 5;8(8):CD012977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012977.pub2.
4
The quality of systematic reviews. High quality reporting of both randomised trials and systematic reviews should be priority.系统评价的质量。高质量报告随机对照试验和系统评价均应作为优先事项。
BMJ. 2000 Jul 29;321(7256):297; author reply 298-9.
5
Comparative effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids for paediatric asthma: protocol for a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.吸入性糖皮质激素治疗儿童哮喘的比较效果：系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 22;5(10):e008501. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008501.
6
Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A protocol for a systematic survey of three clinical specialities.发表在拉美和西班牙语期刊上的随机临床试验报告质量：三个临床专科系统调查的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e036148. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036148.
7
Blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and the risk of asthma attacks in randomised controlled trials: protocol for a systemic review and control arm patient-level meta-analysis for clinical prediction modelling.血液嗜酸性粒细胞、呼出气一氧化氮分数与随机对照试验中哮喘发作的风险：系统评价和控制臂患者水平荟萃分析的方案，用于临床预测模型。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e058215. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058215.
8
Risk of bias and reporting completeness of randomised controlled trials in burn care: protocol for a systematic review.烧伤护理中随机对照试验的偏倚风险和报告完整性评估：系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 18;9(12):e033472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033472.
9
Efficacy and safety of Yu-Ping-Feng powder for asthma in children: a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.玉屏风散治疗儿童哮喘的疗效与安全性：一项随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(1):e18551. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018551.
10
Reports of randomised control trials should begin and conclude with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant trials: a 25-year audit of the quality of trial reports.随机对照试验报告应以对其他相关试验的最新系统评价作为开头和结尾：一项为期25年的试验报告质量审核。
J R Soc Med. 2024 Jun;117(6):212-216. doi: 10.1177/01410768241258090.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of pilot trial abstracts in heart failure is suboptimal: a systematic survey.心力衰竭初步试验摘要的质量未达最佳：一项系统性调查。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 May 31;4:107. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0302-8. eCollection 2018.
2
Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist.使用CONSORT清单对整脊疗法随机对照试验报告的质量
Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Jun 9;24:19. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0099-6. eCollection 2016.
3
The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: a systematic review.哮喘随机对照试验的报告质量：一项系统评价。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Dec;22(4):417-24. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00089.

本文引用的文献

1
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 解释和说明：报告平行组随机试验的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed.2000 年和 2006 年随机试验报告的质量：PubMed 索引文章的比较研究。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c723. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c723.
3
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的系统评价和Meta分析报告的PRISMA声明：解释与详述。
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
4
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.改善实用性试验的报告：CONSORT声明的扩展
BMJ. 2008 Nov 11;337:a2390. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2390.
5
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature.普通内分泌学文献中随机对照试验的报告质量
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Oct;93(10):3810-6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0817. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
6
Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.将CONSORT声明扩展至非药物治疗随机试验：解释与详述
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 19;148(4):295-309. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008.
7
CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.《CONSORT 声明：期刊和会议摘要中随机对照试验报告的解释与详述》
PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 22;5(1):e20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050020.
8
A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting coronary artery bypass grafting trials.一项关于报告冠状动脉搭桥术试验的出版物质量的系统评价。
Can J Surg. 2007 Aug;50(4):266-77.
9
External validity of randomised controlled trials in asthma: to whom do the results of the trials apply?哮喘随机对照试验的外部效度：试验结果适用于哪些人？
Thorax. 2007 Mar;62(3):219-23. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.066837. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
10
Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy.脑瘫随机对照试验的报告质量
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):2222-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1630.

The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Ntala Chara, Birmpili Panagiota, Worth Allison, Anderson Niall H, Sheikh Aziz

机构信息

University of Patras, Medical School, University Campus, PC 26504, Rio, Patras, Greece.

出版信息

Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Mar;22(1):PS1-8. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00003.

DOI:10.4104/pcrj.2013.00003
PMID:23344780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6442771/
Abstract
摘要