Chemistry Department, University of Manitoba, 144 Dysart Road, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2.
Mass Spectrom Rev. 2013 Sep-Oct;32(5):366-85. doi: 10.1002/mas.21367. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
Over the last years, extensive studies have evaluated glycans from different biological samples and validated the importance of glycosylation as one of the most important post-translational modifications of proteins. Although a number of new methods for carbohydrate analysis have been published and there has been significant progress in their identification, the development of new approaches to study these biomolecules and understand their role in living systems are still vivid challenges that intrigue glycobiologists. In the last decade, the success in analyses of oligosaccharides has been driven mainly by the development of innovative, highly sensitive mass spectrometry techniques. For enhanced mass spectrometry detection, carbohydrate molecules are often derivatized. Besides, the type of labeling can influence the fragmentation pattern and make the structural analysis less complicated. In this regard, in 2003 we introduced the low scale, simple non-reductive tagging of glycans employing phenylhydrazine (PHN) as the derivatizing reagent. PHN-labeled glycans showed increased detection and as reported previously they can be analyzed by HPLC, ESI, or MALDI immediately after derivatization. Under tandem mass spectrometry conditions, PHN-derivatives produced useful data for the structural elucidation of oligosaccharides. This approach of analysis has helped to reveal new isomeric structures for glycans of known/unknown composition and has been successfully applied for the profiling of N-glycans obtained from serum samples and cancer cells. The efficacy of this labeling has also been evaluated for different substituted hydrazine reagents. This review summarizes all types of reducing-end labeling based on hydrazone-linkage that have been used for mass spectrometric analyses of oligosaccharides. This review is also aimed at correcting some past misconceptions or interpretations reported in the literature.
在过去的几年中,人们对来自不同生物样本的聚糖进行了广泛的研究,并验证了糖基化作为蛋白质最重要的翻译后修饰之一的重要性。尽管已经发表了许多用于碳水化合物分析的新方法,并且在其鉴定方面取得了重大进展,但开发研究这些生物分子的新方法并了解它们在生命系统中的作用仍然是激发糖生物学家兴趣的生动挑战。在过去的十年中,糖链分析的成功主要得益于创新的、高灵敏度的质谱技术的发展。为了增强质谱检测,碳水化合物分子通常会衍生化。此外,标记的类型会影响片段模式,使结构分析变得不那么复杂。在这方面,我们在 2003 年引入了使用苯肼 (PHN) 作为衍生化试剂的小规模、简单的非还原糖基化标记。PHN 标记的聚糖显示出增强的检测效果,如前所述,它们可以在衍生化后立即通过 HPLC、ESI 或 MALDI 进行分析。在串联质谱条件下,PHN 衍生物可产生有用的数据,用于寡糖的结构阐明。这种分析方法有助于揭示已知/未知组成的聚糖的新的同分异构结构,并已成功应用于从血清样本和癌细胞中获得的 N-聚糖的分析。这种标记的功效也已针对不同取代的肼试剂进行了评估。这篇综述总结了用于寡糖质谱分析的基于腙键的所有类型的还原末端标记。这篇综述还旨在纠正文献中报道的一些过去的误解或解释。