• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第 4 天使用快速检测对机采血小板进行常规细菌筛查:一项为期 4 年的单中心经验。

Routine bacterial screening of apheresis platelets on Day 4 using a rapid test: a 4-year single-center experience.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Department of Medicine, Center for Transfusion Medicine Research, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2013 Oct;53(10):2307-13. doi: 10.1111/trf.12083. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/trf.12083
PMID:23347110
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The platelet (PLT) Pan Genera Detection test (PGD) is a rapid bacterial detection system used to screen PLTs for bacterial contamination. We report a single center 46-month experience with secondary screening of apheresis PLTs by PGD testing.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Existing testing records of apheresis PLTs screened by PGD from July 2008 to April 2012 were reviewed. All PLT units were initially screened by routine postcollection culture methods. Secondary screening using PGD was performed for indated PLTs on PLT storage Day 4 and for outdated PLTs on Day 8.

RESULTS

A total of 8535 apheresis PLTs were available in inventory during the study period. Of these, 5030 (58.9%) were dispensed and transfused before PGD testing and 3505 (41.1%) underwent PGD testing on Day 4. Twenty-five units tested on Day 4 were PGD initial reactive (0.71%). All were confirmed to be false positive by repeat PGD testing in triplicate (n=20) or by confirmatory culture (n=5). An additional 364 units that were PGD nonreactive on Day 4 were approved for transfusion on Day 6 or Day 7 due to urgent clinical need. A total of 371 outdated units underwent repeat PGD testing before discard on Day 8; all were nonreactive.

CONCLUSION

Secondary PGD testing of culture-screened apheresis PLTs results in low yield in a medium-sized transfusion service. Use of PGD testing on Day 4 may allow for extension of the apheresis PLT shelf life to Day 7 for hospitals that face supply constraints.

摘要

背景

血小板(PLT)泛属检测试验(PGD)是一种快速细菌检测系统,用于筛选血小板是否受到细菌污染。我们报告了一家单中心 46 个月的经验,即通过 PGD 检测对单采血小板进行二次筛选。

研究设计和方法

回顾了 2008 年 7 月至 2012 年 4 月期间通过 PGD 筛选的单采血小板的现有检测记录。所有血小板单位最初均通过常规采集后培养方法进行筛选。对过期的血小板在储存第 4 天和第 8 天进行 PGD 二次筛选。

结果

在研究期间,库存中共有 8535 单位单采血小板。其中,5030 单位(58.9%)在进行 PGD 检测之前已发放和输注,3505 单位(41.1%)在第 4 天进行了 PGD 检测。第 4 天检测到的 25 个单位 PGD 初筛呈阳性(0.71%)。所有单位经 PGD 重复检测(n=20)或确认培养(n=5)均证实为假阳性。由于临床急需,364 个在第 4 天 PGD 检测呈阴性的单位在第 6 天或第 7 天获得批准输注。在第 8 天丢弃之前,对总共 371 个过期单位进行了重复 PGD 检测,结果均为阴性。

结论

在中等规模的输血服务中,对培养筛选的单采血小板进行二次 PGD 检测的产量较低。对于面临供应限制的医院,在第 4 天使用 PGD 检测可能会将单采血小板的保质期延长至第 7 天。

相似文献

1
Routine bacterial screening of apheresis platelets on Day 4 using a rapid test: a 4-year single-center experience.第 4 天使用快速检测对机采血小板进行常规细菌筛查:一项为期 4 年的单中心经验。
Transfusion. 2013 Oct;53(10):2307-13. doi: 10.1111/trf.12083. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
2
Detection of bacterial contamination in prestorage culture-negative apheresis platelets on day of issue with the Pan Genera Detection test.使用 Pan 通用检测试验在发出日检测储存前培养阴性的单采血小板中的细菌污染。
Transfusion. 2011 Dec;51(12):2573-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03308.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
3
Bacterial screening of apheresis platelets and the residual risk of septic transfusion reactions: the American Red Cross experience (2004-2006).单采血小板的细菌筛查及感染性输血反应的残余风险:美国红十字会的经验(2004 - 2006年)
Transfusion. 2007 Jul;47(7):1134-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01248.x.
4
Routine use of Day 6 and Day 7 platelets with rapid testing: two hospitals assess impact 1 year after implementation.第6天和第7天血小板的常规使用及快速检测:两家医院评估实施1年后的影响
Transfusion. 2018 Apr;58(4):938-942. doi: 10.1111/trf.14473. Epub 2018 Jan 14.
5
Canadian experience with detection of bacterial contamination in apheresis platelets.加拿大单采血小板细菌污染检测的经验。
Transfusion. 2007 Mar;47(3):421-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01131.x.
6
Routine use of a rapid test to detect bacteria at the time of issue for nonleukoreduced, whole blood-derived platelets.在非去白细胞、全血来源的血小板制备时,常规使用快速检测来检测细菌。
Transfusion. 2013 Apr;53(4):843-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03818.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
7
Long-term Experience with Rapid Screening for Platelet Bacterial Contamination in a High-volume Transfusion Service.在大容量输血服务中进行血小板细菌污染快速筛查的长期经验
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Nov;49(6):748-755.
8
Detection of bacterial contamination in apheresis platelet products: American Red Cross experience, 2004.单采血小板制品中细菌污染的检测:美国红十字会的经验,2004年
Transfusion. 2005 Dec;45(12):1845-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00650.x.
9
Quantitation of coated platelet potential during collection, storage, and transfusion of apheresis platelets.在采集、储存和输注单采血小板过程中对被覆血小板的潜力进行定量。
Transfusion. 2011 Dec;51(12):2690-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03179.x. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
10
Apheresis technology correlates with bacterial contamination of platelets and reported septic transfusion reactions.血液成分单采技术与血小板的细菌污染以及报告的败血症性输血反应相关。
Transfusion. 2017 Dec;57(12):2969-2976. doi: 10.1111/trf.14308. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Advances in Preventing Adverse Reactions to Transfusion.预防输血不良反应的最新进展
F1000Res. 2015 Dec 17;4. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7048.1. eCollection 2015.
2
An Internal Reference Control Duplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detecting Bacterial Contamination in Blood Products.一种用于检测血液制品中细菌污染的内部参考对照双链实时聚合酶链反应检测法。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0134743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134743. eCollection 2015.