• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大容量输血服务中进行血小板细菌污染快速筛查的长期经验

Long-term Experience with Rapid Screening for Platelet Bacterial Contamination in a High-volume Transfusion Service.

作者信息

Alrabeh Reem, Korte Laura, Reyes Meredith, Hartwell Elizabeth, Bracey Arthur

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, CHI St. Luke's Health - Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Nov;49(6):748-755.

PMID:31882425
Abstract

Bacterial sepsis after platelet transfusion is a major cause of transfusion-transmitted infections in the US. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends performing quality control for platelet bacterial detection on days 4 and 5 before platelet transfusion. We assessed the feasibility of implementing the Pan Genera Detection (PGD) test, an FDA-approved immunoassay for platelet bacterial detection, for the primary and secondary bacterial screening of platelet units in a high-volume setting. Records were reviewed from January 2010 through December 2015. All apheresis platelets underwent primary screening by using culture methods. Additional screening with the PGD test was performed daily until February 2013, when PGD testing of apheresis platelets was performed at the start of storage day 5. In April 2015, PGD testing of apheresis platelet products was performed at the start of storage day 4. Post-storage pooled whole blood-derived platelets were screened by using the PGD test on the day of use. During the 6-year study period, 16,839 PGD tests were performed. If the PGD test was reactive, repeat PGD testing was performed. In cases of repeat reactivity, units were quarantined and cultured. Initially, 42 (0.25%) tests were reactive; 26/42 (61.91%) were repeatedly reactive and resulted in an overall PGD repeat reactivity rate of 0.15%. Only one sample grew coagulase-negative No transfusion-transmitted infections were reported. The PGD bacterial detection assay was feasible and efficient in our high-volume transfusion service.

摘要

在美国,血小板输注后发生的细菌性败血症是输血传播感染的主要原因。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)建议在血小板输注前第4天和第5天对血小板进行细菌检测的质量控制。我们评估了实施泛属检测(PGD)试验的可行性,这是一种经FDA批准的用于血小板细菌检测的免疫测定法,用于在大容量环境下对血小板单位进行一级和二级细菌筛查。回顾了2010年1月至2015年12月的记录。所有单采血小板均采用培养方法进行一级筛查。在2013年2月之前,每天都使用PGD试验进行额外筛查,之后在储存第5天开始时对单采血小板进行PGD检测。2015年4月,在储存第4天开始时对单采血小板产品进行PGD检测。储存后的混合全血来源血小板在使用当天采用PGD试验进行筛查。在6年的研究期间,共进行了16,839次PGD检测。如果PGD试验呈阳性反应,则进行重复PGD检测。在重复阳性反应的情况下,对单位进行隔离并培养。最初,42次(0.25%)检测呈阳性反应;26/42次(61.91%)重复呈阳性反应,导致PGD重复阳性反应率总体为0.15%。只有一个样本培养出凝固酶阴性菌。未报告输血传播感染。PGD细菌检测试验在我们的大容量输血服务中是可行且有效的。

相似文献

1
Long-term Experience with Rapid Screening for Platelet Bacterial Contamination in a High-volume Transfusion Service.在大容量输血服务中进行血小板细菌污染快速筛查的长期经验
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Nov;49(6):748-755.
2
Routine bacterial screening of apheresis platelets on Day 4 using a rapid test: a 4-year single-center experience.第 4 天使用快速检测对机采血小板进行常规细菌筛查:一项为期 4 年的单中心经验。
Transfusion. 2013 Oct;53(10):2307-13. doi: 10.1111/trf.12083. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
3
Detection of bacterial contamination in prestorage culture-negative apheresis platelets on day of issue with the Pan Genera Detection test.使用 Pan 通用检测试验在发出日检测储存前培养阴性的单采血小板中的细菌污染。
Transfusion. 2011 Dec;51(12):2573-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03308.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
4
The Pan Genera Detection immunoassay: a novel point-of-issue method for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.泛属检测免疫测定:一种新颖的即时检测点方法,用于检测血小板浓缩物中的细菌污染。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3475-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00542-10. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
5
Routine use of a rapid test to detect bacteria at the time of issue for nonleukoreduced, whole blood-derived platelets.在非去白细胞、全血来源的血小板制备时,常规使用快速检测来检测细菌。
Transfusion. 2013 Apr;53(4):843-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03818.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
Bacterial screening of outdated buffy coat platelet pools using a culture system and a rapid immunoassay.使用培养系统和快速免疫测定法对陈旧的富血小板血浆池进行细菌筛查。
Transfusion. 2011 Dec;51(12):2566-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03311.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
7
Experience with universal bacterial culturing to detect contamination of apheresis platelet units in a hospital transfusion service.一家医院输血服务机构采用通用细菌培养法检测单采血小板单位污染情况的经验。
Transfusion. 2002 Jul;42(7):855-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00136.x.
8
Improvement in Platelet Product Wastage and Reduction of Costs through Implementation of the Pan Genera Detection Test.通过实施泛属检测试验,提高血小板产品利用率并降低成本。
Lab Med. 2023 May 2;54(3):287-290. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmac111.
9
Implementation of secondary bacterial culture testing of platelets to mitigate residual risk of septic transfusion reactions.开展血小板的二次细菌培养检测以降低感染性输血反应的残余风险。
Transfusion. 2018 Jul;58(7):1647-1653. doi: 10.1111/trf.14618. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
10
Adoption trends of point of issue Verax PGD rapid test for bacterial screening of platelets between 2013 and 2018 among hospitals supplied by the American Red Cross and impact on platelet availability.2013 年至 2018 年间,美国红十字会供应医院对 Verax PGD 血小板细菌快速检测点的采用趋势及其对血小板供应的影响。
Transfusion. 2020 Jul;60(7):1364-1372. doi: 10.1111/trf.15817. Epub 2020 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Acquired platelet storage container leaks and contamination with environmental bacteria: A preventable cause of bacterial sepsis.获得性血小板储存容器泄漏和环境污染细菌:细菌败血症的可预防原因。
Transfusion. 2022 Mar;62(3):641-650. doi: 10.1111/trf.16776. Epub 2021 Dec 20.