• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国光化性角化病的流行状况和危险因素——多源数据分析。

Prevalence and risk factors of actinic keratoses in Germany--analysis of multisource data.

机构信息

CVderm - German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Mar;28(3):309-13. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12102. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/jdv.12102
PMID:23347271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Europe, only few and inconsistent data on the prevalence and treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) are available.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of AK in Germany, to identify potential predictors and to estimate the number of AK cases treated in dermatological practices.

METHODS

In a multiple-source approach, prevalence was assessed from whole-body examinations in a cohort of 90 800 employees and from nationwide statutory health insurance (SHI) data of 2008. The number of cases documented in dermatological offices was estimated from statistics of a SHI Physicians Association.

RESULTS

Standardized prevalence of AK from dermatological examinations was 2.7%; the rate increased with age (11.5% in the group 60-70 years) and was higher for men (3.9%) than for women (1.5%). Significant associations were also identified for skin phototype I, sunburns in childhood and solar lentigines. Vitiligo and a history of melanoma were also, but not significantly, associated with AK. In the SHI data analysis, standardized AK prevalence was 1.8%. Age-specific rates were below 1.5% up to 60 years and rose to 8.2% (13.2% in men) in the group 80-89 years. The prevalence from these large data sets--which is at the lower limit of studies from other countries--suggests about 1.7 million estimated AK cases in Germany. In 2011, AK accounted for 8.3% of the hundred most frequently treated dermatological outpatient diagnoses. The proportion of AK cases has risen almost continuously over the last 10 years, compared to other dermatological conditions. Estimated annual number of AK cases documented by dermatologists in Germany is about 1.7 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Actinic keratosis is a frequent condition in higher age groups and more prevalent in men; a relevant need for health care is evident. Predictors and risk factors for AK are easy to identify in the population, which could also help to detect groups with special need for preventive measures.

摘要

背景

在欧洲,仅有少量关于光化性角化病(AK)的流行率和治疗的数据,且这些数据并不一致。

目的

确定德国 AK 的流行率,识别潜在的预测因素,并估计皮肤科诊所治疗的 AK 病例数。

方法

采用多源方法,从 90800 名员工的全身检查和 2008 年全国法定健康保险(SHI)数据中评估流行率。从 SHI 医师协会的统计数据中估计皮肤科诊所记录的病例数。

结果

皮肤科检查的 AK 标准化流行率为 2.7%;该比率随年龄增长而增加(60-70 岁组为 11.5%),男性(3.9%)高于女性(1.5%)。皮肤光型 I、儿童期晒伤和日光性雀斑也与 AK 显著相关。白癜风和黑色素瘤病史也与 AK 相关,但无统计学意义。在 SHI 数据分析中,标准化 AK 流行率为 1.8%。特定年龄组的比率在 60 岁以下低于 1.5%,在 80-89 岁组中上升至 8.2%(男性为 13.2%)。这些大型数据集的流行率——处于其他国家研究的下限——表明德国估计有 170 万 AK 病例。2011 年,AK 占 100 种最常治疗的皮肤科门诊诊断的 8.3%。与其他皮肤科疾病相比,过去 10 年来 AK 病例的比例几乎持续上升。德国皮肤科医生记录的 AK 病例年估计数约为 170 万。

结论

光化性角化病是年龄较大人群中的常见疾病,男性更为常见;明显需要医疗保健。AK 的预测因素和危险因素在人群中很容易识别,这也有助于发现需要特殊预防措施的人群。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and risk factors of actinic keratoses in Germany--analysis of multisource data.德国光化性角化病的流行状况和危险因素——多源数据分析。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Mar;28(3):309-13. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12102. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
2
Prevalence of actinic keratosis and its risk factors in the general population: the Rotterdam Study.普通人群中光化性角化病的患病率及其危险因素:鹿特丹研究。
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Aug;133(8):1971-8. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.134. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
3
Predisposing factors of actinic keratosis in a North-West German population.德国西北部人群日光性角化病的诱发因素。
Eur J Dermatol. 2009 Jul-Aug;19(4):345-54. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2009.0706. Epub 2009 May 25.
4
Prevalence of actinic keratosis among dermatology outpatients in Austria.奥地利皮肤科门诊患者中光化性角化病的患病率。
Br J Dermatol. 2014 Dec;171(6):1415-21. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13132. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
5
Prevalence of actinic keratosis among dermatology outpatients in Spain.西班牙皮肤科门诊患者中光化性角化病的患病率。
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016 Oct;107(8):674-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
6
Prevalence of Actinic Keratosis in Patients Attending General Practitioners in Switzerland.瑞士全科医生诊所患者中光化性角化病的患病率。
Dermatology. 2018;234(5-6):214-219. doi: 10.1159/000491820. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
7
Risk factors for actinic keratosis in eight European centres: a case-control study.八项欧洲中心光化性角化病的风险因素:病例对照研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Aug;167 Suppl 2:36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11085.x.
8
[Secondary data analysis of the prevalence of alcohol dependence (F10.2) in Germany].[德国酒精依赖症(F10.2)患病率的二次数据分析]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2014 Nov;139(45):2285-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387353. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9
Prevalence and awareness of actinic keratosis: barriers and opportunities.光化性角化病的流行情况和知晓率:障碍和机遇。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jan;68(1 Suppl 1):S2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.052.
10
Study design and preliminary results from the pilot phase of the PraKtis study: self-reported diagnoses of selected skin diseases in a representative sample of the Italian population.PraKtis研究试点阶段的研究设计与初步结果:意大利人群代表性样本中选定皮肤疾病的自我报告诊断情况
Dermatology. 2004;208(1):38-42. doi: 10.1159/000075044.

引用本文的文献

1
A Non-randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of 10% Aminolevulinic Acid Gel in the Expanded Field-directed Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Face and Scalp with Red Light Photodynamic Therapy.一项非随机、开放标签、多中心研究,旨在评估10%氨基乙酰丙酸凝胶联合红光光动力疗法对面部和头皮光化性角化病进行扩大野定向治疗的安全性和耐受性。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2025 Apr;18(4):44-50.
2
Epidemiology and Management of Actinic Keratosis in France: A General Population Survey (REAKT).法国光化性角化病的流行病学与管理:一项普通人群调查(REAKT)
Acta Derm Venereol. 2025 Jan 26;105:adv42372. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v105.42372.
3
Long-term follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, phase III, multi-centre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of field-directed photodynamic therapy (PDT) of mild to moderate actinic keratosis using BF-200 ALA versus placebo and the BF-RhodoLED® lamp.
一项随机、双盲、III期、多中心研究的长期随访,该研究旨在评估使用BF-200 ALA对比安慰剂及BF-RhodoLED®灯对轻度至中度光化性角化病进行病灶定向光动力疗法(PDT)的安全性和有效性。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Dec 12. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20452.
4
Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Actinic Keratosis. What is New for The Management for Sun-Damaged Skin.光化性角化病的流行病学与危险因素。日光损伤皮肤管理的新进展。
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024 Sep 1;14(3 S1):e2024146S. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1403S1a146S.
5
Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Dermoscopy of Facial Pigmented and Non-Pigmented Actinic Keratosis Features before and after Photodynamic Therapy Treatment.光动力治疗前后面部色素性和非色素性光化性角化病特征的反射式共聚焦显微镜检查和皮肤镜检查
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 27;15(23):5598. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235598.
6
Safety of photodynamic therapy combined with surgical excision in patients with actinic keratosis and risk factors for secondary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.光动力疗法联合手术切除治疗光化性角化病患者的安全性及继发皮肤鳞状细胞癌的危险因素
Am J Transl Res. 2023 May 15;15(5):3548-3555. eCollection 2023.
7
UVR Exposure and Prevention of Street Construction Workers in Colombia and Germany.在哥伦比亚和德国,建筑工人暴露于紫外线辐射及其预防。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;19(12):7259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127259.
8
Risk Factors for Actinic Keratoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.光化性角化病的危险因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Indian J Dermatol. 2022 Jan-Feb;67(1):92. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_859_21.
9
Spontaneous regression rates of actinic keratosis: a systematic review and pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.光化性角化病自发消退率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):5884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09722-8.
10
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirbanibulin for Actinic Keratosis of the Face and Scalp in Europe: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.替巴替尼治疗欧洲面部和头皮光化性角化病的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 16;11(6):1654. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061654.