Suppr超能文献

缺血性和扩张型心肌病患者复极斜率的长期预后价值。

Long-term prognostic value of restitution slope in patients with ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathies.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054768. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An action potential duration (APD) restitution curve with a steep slope ≥1 has been associated with increased susceptibility for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. We aimed to evaluate the "restitution hypothesis" and tested ventricular APD restitution slope as well as effective refractory period (ERP)/APD ratio for long-term prognostic value in patients with ischemic (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Monophasic action potentials were recorded in patients with ICM (n = 32) and DCM (n = 42) undergoing routine programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 32±7% and 28±9%, respectively. APD and ERP were measured at baseline stimulation (S(1)) and upon introduction of one to three extrastimuli (S(2)-S(4)). ERP/APD ratios and the APD restitution curve were calculated and the maximum restitution slope was determined. After a mean follow-up of 6.1±3.0 years, the combined end-point of mortality and and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock was not predicted by restitution slope or ERP/APD ratios. Comparing S(2) vs. S(3) vs. S(4) extrastimuli for restitution slope (1.5±0.6 vs. 1.4±0.4 vs. 1.3±0.5; p = NS), additional extrastimuli did not lead to a steepening restitution slope. ERP/APD ratio decreased with additional extrastimuli (0.98±0.09 [S(1)] vs. 0.97±0.10 [S(2)] vs. 0.93±0.11 [S(3)]; p = 0.03 S(1) vs. S(3)). Positive PVS was strongly predictive of outcome (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Neither ventricular APD restitution slope nor ERP/APD ratios predict outcome in patients with ICM or DCM.

摘要

背景

动作电位时程(APD)恢复曲线斜率≥1 与恶性室性心律失常易感性增加有关。我们旨在评估“恢复假说”,并测试缺血性(ICM)或扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者的心室 APD 恢复斜率以及有效不应期(ERP)/APD 比值的长期预后价值。

方法/主要发现:在接受常规程控心室刺激(PVS)的 ICM(n=32)和 DCM(n=42)患者中记录单相动作电位。左心室射血分数分别为 32±7%和 28±9%。在基础刺激(S(1))和引入一个至三个次刺激(S(2)-S(4))时测量 APD 和 ERP。计算 ERP/APD 比值和 APD 恢复曲线,并确定最大恢复斜率。在平均 6.1±3.0 年的随访后,死亡率和/或植入式心脏复律除颤器电击的联合终点未被恢复斜率或 ERP/APD 比值预测。比较 S(2)与 S(3)与 S(4)次刺激的恢复斜率(1.5±0.6 与 1.4±0.4 与 1.3±0.5;p=NS),额外的次刺激不会导致恢复斜率变陡。随着额外次刺激的增加,ERP/APD 比值降低(0.98±0.09[S(1)]与 0.97±0.10[S(2)]与 0.93±0.11[S(3)];p=0.03,S(1)与 S(3))。阳性 PVS 强烈预测结果(p=0.006)。

结论/意义:在 ICM 或 DCM 患者中,心室 APD 恢复斜率或 ERP/APD 比值均不能预测结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aa3/3548796/058c56b11889/pone.0054768.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验