Department of Neurology, Yagüe General Hospital, Burgos, Spain.
J Pediatr. 2013 Jul;163(1):217-23.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.030. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
To analyze the association between tic disorders and poor academic performance in school-aged children.
This was a cross-sectional, observational study conducted in a randomly selected sample of mainstream school-aged children (aged 6-16 years). The sampling frame included different types of schools and educational levels. Children with poor academic performance (eg, repeating a grade, special needs), and tic disorders (defined based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision criteria) were identified. Children with and without tics and children with and without poor academic performance were compared in terms of clinical features (ie, medical history and neurologic and psychiatric comorbidities), school, and environmental characteristics. Logistic regression analyses were performed using school performance (dependent variable) and tic disorders (independent variable), after adjusting for confounding variables.
The study cohort comprised 1867 children (mean age, 10.9 + 2.9 years; 1007 males [53.9%]). Tics were present in 162 children (8.6%), and poor academic performance was noted in 223 (11.9%). Overall poor academic performance was associated with age (OR, 1.71; P < .0001), television viewing (OR, 5.33; P = .04), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (OR, 1.38; P < .0001), and family history of school dysfunction (OR, 2.43; P = .02) and was negatively associated with higher IQ score (OR, 0.90; P < .0001) and tic disorders (OR, 0.29; P = .01).
After adjusting for other covariates, the presence of tic disorders was not associated with poor academic performance in our cohort. Early academic support and modification of environmental characteristics are needed for children at higher risk for school dysfunction, to enhance academic performance.
分析学龄儿童抽动障碍与学业成绩不佳之间的关系。
这是一项横断面观察性研究,在随机选择的主流学龄儿童(6-16 岁)样本中进行。抽样框架包括不同类型的学校和教育水平。确定学业成绩不佳(例如,留级、特殊需求)和抽动障碍(根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版修订版标准定义)的儿童。比较有和无抽动障碍以及有和无学业成绩不佳的儿童的临床特征(即病史和神经及精神共病)、学校和环境特征。使用逻辑回归分析,以学业成绩(因变量)和抽动障碍(自变量),在校正混杂因素后进行。
研究队列包括 1867 名儿童(平均年龄,10.9 ± 2.9 岁;1007 名男性[53.9%])。162 名儿童存在抽动(8.6%),223 名儿童学业成绩不佳(11.9%)。总体学业成绩不佳与年龄(OR,1.71;P<0.0001)、看电视(OR,5.33;P=0.04)、注意缺陷多动障碍(OR,1.38;P<0.0001)和家庭学校功能障碍史(OR,2.43;P=0.02)有关,与较高智商评分(OR,0.90;P<0.0001)和抽动障碍(OR,0.29;P=0.01)呈负相关。
在校正其他协变量后,本队列中抽动障碍的存在与学业成绩不佳无关。对于有更高学校功能障碍风险的儿童,需要早期提供学业支持和调整环境特征,以提高学业成绩。