Suppr超能文献

朗氏手法治疗慢性机械性颈部疼痛患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

The effectiveness of Long's manipulation on patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Lin Jian Hua, Shen Tong, Chung Raymond Chi Keung, Chiu Thomas Tai Wing

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2013 Aug;18(4):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.11.005. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

Abstract

Long's manipulation (LM) is a representative Chinese manipulation approach incorporating both spinal manipulation and traditional Chinese massage (TCM) techniques. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the immediate and short-term relative effectiveness of LM to TCM on patients with chronic neck pain. Patients were randomly assigned to either LM group or TCM group. LM group was treated with Long's manipulation, while the TCM group received TCM therapy. Patients attended 8 sessions of treatment (one session every three days). Outcome measures included neck disability (Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire; NPQ), pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale; NPRS), patient perceived satisfaction of care (PPS) (11-point scale), craniovertebral angle (CV angle) and cervical range of motion (ROM). A blinded assessor performed assessment at baseline, immediate after treatment and 3 months post treatment. LM group achieved significantly greater improvement than TCM group in pain intensity (p < 0.001), neck disability (p = 0.049) and satisfaction (p < 0.001) up to 3-month follow-up. There was no significant difference in improvements in CV angle and most of cervical ROM between groups (p = 0.169 ∼ 0.888) with an exception of flexion at 3-month follow-up (p = 0.005). This study shows that LM could produce better effects than TCM in relieving pain and improving disability in the management of patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.

摘要

龙氏整复手法(LM)是一种具有代表性的中医疗法,融合了脊柱整复手法和传统中医按摩技术。这项随机对照试验(RCT)旨在比较龙氏整复手法与传统中医疗法对慢性颈痛患者的即时和短期相对疗效。患者被随机分为龙氏整复手法组或传统中医疗法组。龙氏整复手法组采用龙氏整复手法治疗,而传统中医疗法组接受传统中医疗法治疗。患者接受8次治疗(每三天一次)。疗效指标包括颈部功能障碍(诺斯威克公园颈部疼痛问卷;NPQ)、疼痛强度(数字疼痛评分量表;NPRS)、患者对治疗的满意度(PPS)(11分制)、颅颈角(CV角)和颈椎活动度(ROM)。由一名盲法评估者在基线、治疗后即刻和治疗后3个月进行评估。在长达3个月的随访中,龙氏整复手法组在疼痛强度(p < 0.001)、颈部功能障碍(p = 0.049)和满意度(p < 0.001)方面的改善明显大于传统中医疗法组。两组之间在CV角和大多数颈椎ROM的改善方面没有显著差异(p = 0.169 ∼ 0.888),但在3个月随访时的前屈方面除外(p = 0.005)。这项研究表明,在慢性机械性颈痛患者的治疗中,龙氏整复手法在缓解疼痛和改善功能障碍方面比传统中医疗法效果更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验