• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的单支或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

作者信息

Varani Elisabetta, Balducelli Marco, Aquilina Matteo, Vecchi Giuseppe, Hussien Mohamed Naseem, Frassineti Valeria, Maresta Aleardo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):927-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21722.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.21722
PMID:18798239
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD), in relation to single or multivessel (MV)-PCI and to patients with single vessel disease (SVD).

METHODS

Patients treated with PCI in the setting of <24 hr STEMI in the years 2004-2007 were considered.

RESULTS

Seven hundred forty-five primary PCI, 346 (46%) in patients with SVD and 399 (54%) in patients with MVD were performed. Among MVD patients, 156 (39%) had infarct related artery (IRA)-only treatment and 243 had MV-PCI: 147 (37%) in a single session, 48 (12%) within 24 hr, and 48 (12%) predischarge. Revascularization was complete in 46% of MVD patients. At a median follow-up of 597 days, mortality was 6.3% in SVD and 12% in MVD (P = 0.007), new revascularization 2.9% and 9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 2.4% in SVD and 6.7% in MVD (P = 0.006). After exclusion of patients with cardiogenic shock or pulmonary oedema, more frequent in the MV-PCI in single session group (P = 0.006), 30-day mortality was SVD 1.3%, IRA-only 6.3%, MV-PCI 2.8% (P = 0.023), without differences if in a single (3.3%) or in staged session (2.2%). By multivariate analysis, female sex, anterior STEMI, cardiogenic shock, MVD, and procedural failure were independent predictors of 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

STEMI patients with MVD have a worse prognosis than those with SVD. MV-PCI in patients without hemodynamic compromise yields good short-term results, even if performed very early, with a 30-day mortality in between that of SVD patients and that of MVD patients with IRA-only treatment.

摘要

目的

评估多支血管病变(MVD)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的临床结果,比较单支血管或多支血管(MV)-PCI与单支血管病变(SVD)患者的情况。

方法

纳入2004年至2007年期间在<24小时STEMI情况下接受PCI治疗的患者。

结果

共进行了745例直接PCI,其中346例(46%)为SVD患者,399例(54%)为MVD患者。在MVD患者中,156例(39%)仅对梗死相关动脉(IRA)进行了治疗,243例接受了MV-PCI:147例(37%)在单次手术中进行,48例(12%)在24小时内进行,48例(12%)在出院前进行。46%的MVD患者血运重建完成。在中位随访597天时,SVD患者的死亡率为6.3%,MVD患者为12%(P = 0.007),再次血运重建率分别为2.9%和9%(P < 0.001)。30天死亡率SVD患者为2.4%,MVD患者为6.7%(P = 0.006)。排除心源性休克或肺水肿患者后(单次MV-PCI组中此类患者更常见,P = 0.006),30天死亡率SVD患者为1.3%,仅IRA治疗患者为6.3%,MV-PCI患者为2.8%(P = 0.023),单次手术(3.3%)或分期手术(2.2%)之间无差异。多因素分析显示,女性、前壁STEMI、心源性休克、MVD和手术失败是30天死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

MVD的STEMI患者预后比SVD患者差。在无血流动力学障碍的患者中,MV-PCI即使在非常早期进行也能产生良好的短期结果,其30天死亡率介于SVD患者和仅IRA治疗的MVD患者之间。

相似文献

1
Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的单支或多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):927-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21722.
2
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization.急性心肌梗死、心搏骤停复苏后和心原性休克患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:多血管血运重建的作用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
3
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者采用仅处理罪犯血管、即刻或分期多支血管经皮血管重建策略的长期预后:来自REAL注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):912-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25374. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
4
Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后30天和1年死亡率的预测因素。
Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Sep;20(6):415-21. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32832e5c4c.
5
Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease.罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与多血管和分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多血管病变患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan;3(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.017.
6
Impact of multivessel coronary disease on one-year clinical outcomes and five-year mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.多支冠状动脉病变对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者一年临床结局和五年死亡率的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(4):336-43.
7
Evaluation of the effect of a concurrent chronic total occlusion on long-term mortality and left ventricular function in patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.评价原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后并发慢性完全闭塞对长期死亡率和左心室功能的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.024.
8
Prognostic impact of a chronic total occlusion in a non-infarct-related artery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 3-year results from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者非梗死相关动脉慢性完全闭塞的预后影响:来自 HORIZONS-AMI 试验的 3 年结果。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Mar;33(6):768-75. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr471. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
9
Completeness of revascularization in patients with ST-Elevation acute myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者的血管再通完整性
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):934-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21875.
10
Comparison of infarct-related artery vs multivessel revascularization in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: analysis from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者梗死相关动脉与多血管血运重建的比较:来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册登记研究的分析。
Cardiol J. 2012;19(3):256-66. doi: 10.5603/cj.2012.0047.

引用本文的文献

1
Optional Revascularization Strategies for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的选择性血运重建策略
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 4;25(6):209. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2506209. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Immediate versus staged revascularisation of non-culprit arteries in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者非罪犯血管即刻与分期血运重建:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Neth Heart J. 2022 Oct;30(10):449-456. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01687-7. Epub 2022 May 10.
3
Genetics, coronary artery disease, and myocardial revascularization: will novel genetic risk scores bring new answers?
遗传学、冠状动脉疾病与心肌血运重建:新型遗传风险评分会带来新答案吗?
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;34(Suppl 3):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s12055-017-0635-6. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
4
One-Year Clinical Outcomes between Single- versus Multi-Staged PCI for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH).单阶段与多阶段经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉疾病的一年临床结局:来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究-国立卫生研究院(KAMIR-NIH)
Korean Circ J. 2020 Mar;50(3):220-233. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0176.
5
Revascularization strategies for patients with myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease: A critical appraisal of the current evidence.心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的血运重建策略:对当前证据的批判性评估
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Sep;16(9):717-723. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.001.
6
Metaanalysis of Multivessel vs Culprit Artery Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中多支血管与仅罪犯血管行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的Meta分析
Ochsner J. 2019 Summer;19(2):107-115. doi: 10.31486/toj.18.0033.
7
Continuum of Care for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Optimizing Treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Non-St-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征的连续护理:优化ST段抬高型心肌梗死和非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的治疗
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Sep;17(3):114-138. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000151.
8
Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建:当代综述
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Apr 7;20(5):41. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0636-9.
9
Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction - The Primacy of Randomised Trials.ST段抬高型心肌梗死的预防性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——随机试验的首要地位
Interv Cardiol. 2015 Mar;10(1):32-34. doi: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.32.
10
Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.急性心肌梗死和多血管病变的再灌注策略。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):665-678. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.88. Epub 2017 Jun 29.