Suppr超能文献

接受不同类型常规修复治疗后口腔健康相关生活质量的自我感知变化:队列随访研究。

Self-perceived changes in oral health-related quality of life after receiving different types of conventional prosthetic treatments: a cohort follow-up study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca (USAL), C/Alfonso X el Sabio s/n, Campus de Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

J Dent. 2013 Jun;41(6):493-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the changes in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) reported by subjects treated with conventional prostheses.

METHODS

A consecutive sample of 153 patients seeking prosthodontic rehabilitation was recruited. Socio-demographic and prosthetic-related factors (Eichner Index; number of occlusal, aesthetic, and lost units) were registered. Baseline impacts on OHRQoL were collected using the OHIP-14 questionnaire. One month after treatment, the participants answered whether the prostheses had generated better, equal, or poorer effects within the 14 items of a retrospective scale (Post-OHIP). The study patients were compared with the reference population (P-population; n=123) in terms of OHRQoL. Such P-population consisted of Spanish adults wearing conventional dental prostheses who were not seeking any dental treatment. The reliability and validity of the tests applied and the factor structure of the Post-OHIP were investigated. A Poisson regression model was calculated to predict what items would change favourably after treatment.

RESULTS

Four prosthetic cohorts were established according to the types of rehabilitations performed: 1-FDPs: metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses; 2-M-RPDs: metal-based removable partial dentures; 3-ADs: acrylic partial dentures and 4-CDs: complete dentures. Both tests confirmed adequate psychometric properties. Most items of the Post-OHIP consistently loaded on a single factor. Patients requiring ADs or CDs reported significantly lower baseline OHRQoL than those needing M-RPDs or FDPs. Pain/discomfort was the only hampering issue subsequent to removable rehabilitation. M-RPDs are expected to provide the significantly highest therapeutic improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients perceived benefits in chewing ability, aesthetics and satisfaction with their mouth after receiving conventional dental prostheses.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Conventional prosthetic therapy enhances patients' overall well-being although it can cause discomfort and chewing dysfunction in more than 20% of subjects. Metal-based removable partial dentures are the most predictable in terms of patient satisfaction. The higher the clinical impairment felt by patients, the higher the increase in OHRQoL after rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

评估接受常规修复体治疗的患者口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的变化。

方法

连续招募了 153 名寻求修复体治疗的患者。记录了社会人口统计学和修复体相关因素(Eichner 指数;咬合、美学和缺失单位的数量)。使用 OHIP-14 问卷收集基线 OHRQoL 影响。治疗后 1 个月,参与者使用回顾性量表的 14 项内容回答修复体产生的效果是更好、相同还是更差(Post-OHIP)。将研究患者与参考人群(P 人群;n=123)进行比较,后者由佩戴常规牙修复体且未寻求任何牙科治疗的西班牙成年人组成。评估了应用测试的可靠性和有效性以及 Post-OHIP 的因子结构。计算泊松回归模型以预测治疗后哪些项目会有利地改变。

结果

根据进行的修复类型建立了四个修复体队列:1-FDPs:金属陶瓷固定义齿;2-M-RPDs:金属基可摘局部义齿;3-ADs:丙烯酸局部义齿和 4-CDs:全口义齿。两种测试均证实具有足够的心理计量学特性。Post-OHIP 的大多数项目一致加载在单个因子上。需要 ADs 或 CDs 的患者的 OHRQoL 基线明显低于需要 M-RPDs 或 FDPs 的患者。疼痛/不适是随后可摘修复后的唯一妨碍问题。M-RPDs 预计会提供显著更高的治疗改善。

结论

患者在接受常规牙修复体后,在咀嚼能力、美观和口腔满意度方面都感受到了益处。

临床意义

常规修复体治疗虽然会导致超过 20%的患者出现不适和咀嚼功能障碍,但能提高患者的整体幸福感。在患者满意度方面,金属基可摘局部义齿最具预测性。患者感到的临床损伤程度越高,康复后 OHRQoL 的增加就越高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验