Suppr超能文献

棘突间撑开器治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄:有理由开展正规试验。

Interspinous spacers for lumbar foraminal stenosis: formal trials are justified.

机构信息

Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S47-53. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2650-z. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether preliminary evidence supports X-STOP implants as an effective treatment for lumbar radiculopathy secondary to foraminal stenosis, and if larger formal trials are warranted.

METHODS

Participants had a clinical diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy supported by MRI findings of foraminal stenosis and relevant nerve root compression. Self-reported disability and pain were measured pre-operation, early and late post-operation using the widely used Oswestry Disablity Index (ODI) and the bodily pain scale of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36BP). The statistical significance (paired samples t test; Wilcoxon signed ranks test), and clinical significance (Cohen's effect size; Standardised response means) of change scores was determined.

RESULTS

Fifteen people had X-STOP implants. Data pre- early- and late post-operation were available for ten. Self-reported disability and pain improved substantially by the early post operative measurement. Mean change scores (ODI = 29; SF-36BP = -45), significant at the p < 0.05 but not significant at the p < 0.001, were very large and effect sizes exceeded notably criteria for large clinical improvements (>0.80). Improvements were maintained at 2-3 years. Both scales had floor and ceiling effects implying changes may be underestimated. There were no surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study, X-STOP appeared safe and effective. It is less invasive than other established surgical procedures, but does not jeopardise other options in the event of failure. Large scale clinical trials are justified but floor and ceiling effects suggest that the ODI and SF-36 may not be the best choice of outcome measures for those studies.

摘要

目的

确定 X-STOP 植入物是否为治疗椎间孔狭窄引起的腰椎神经根病的有效方法,如果需要更大规模的正式试验。

方法

参与者的临床诊断为腰椎神经根病,MRI 检查结果为椎间孔狭窄和相关神经根受压。使用广泛使用的 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和医疗结果研究 36 项简短健康调查身体疼痛量表(SF-36BP),在术前、术后早期和晚期测量自我报告的残疾和疼痛。通过配对样本 t 检验(Wilcoxon 符号秩检验)确定变化分数的统计学意义(p<0.05 但无统计学意义 p<0.001)和临床意义(Cohen 的效应大小;标准化反应均值)。

结果

15 人接受了 X-STOP 植入物。10 人有术前、早期和晚期术后数据。自我报告的残疾和疼痛在术后早期测量时明显改善。平均变化分数(ODI=29;SF-36BP=-45)在 p<0.05 时有统计学意义,但在 p<0.001 时无统计学意义,效应量非常大,明显大于大临床改善的标准(>0.80)。改善在 2-3 年内保持。两个量表都有地板和天花板效应,这意味着变化可能被低估。没有手术并发症。

结论

在这项小型研究中,X-STOP 似乎是安全有效的。与其他已确立的手术程序相比,它的侵入性较小,但如果失败,也不会危及其他选择。有理由进行大规模临床试验,但地板和天花板效应表明,ODI 和 SF-36 可能不是这些研究的最佳选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验