NPURU, USDA, ARS, P. O. Box 8048, University, MS 38677, USA.
J Chem Ecol. 2013 Feb;39(2):333-47. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0240-0. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
For a little over a decade, omics methods (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and physionomics) have been used to discover and probe the mode of action of both synthetic and natural phytotoxins. For mode of action discovery, the strategy for each of these approaches is to generate an omics profile for phytotoxins with known molecular targets and to compare this library of responses to the responses of compounds with unknown modes of action. Using more than one omics approach enhances the probability of success. Generally, compounds with the same mode of action generate similar responses with a particular omics method. Stress and detoxification responses to phytotoxins can be much clearer than effects directly related to the target site. Clues to new modes of action must be validated with in vitro enzyme effects or genetic approaches. Thus far, the only new phytotoxin target site discovered with omics approaches (metabolomics and physionomics) is that of cinmethylin and structurally related 5-benzyloxymethyl-1,2-isoxazolines. These omics approaches pointed to tyrosine amino-transferase as the target, which was verified by enzyme assays and genetic methods. In addition to being a useful tool of mode of action discovery, omics methods provide detailed information on genetic and biochemical impacts of phytotoxins. Such information can be useful in understanding the full impact of natural phytotoxins in both agricultural and natural ecosystems.
十多年来,组学方法(转录组学、蛋白质组学、代谢组学和生理组学)已被用于发现和探究合成和天然植物毒素的作用模式。对于作用模式的发现,这些方法中的每一种策略都是为具有已知分子靶标的植物毒素生成组学图谱,并将这些反应库与作用模式未知的化合物的反应进行比较。使用多种组学方法可以提高成功的概率。通常,具有相同作用模式的化合物会在特定的组学方法中产生相似的反应。植物毒素引起的应激和解毒反应比直接与靶标相关的作用更明显。新作用模式的线索必须通过体外酶作用或遗传方法进行验证。到目前为止,通过组学方法(代谢组学和生理组学)发现的唯一新的植物毒素靶标是 cinmethylin 和结构相关的 5-苄基氧甲基-1,2-异恶唑啉。这些组学方法指出酪氨酸氨基转移酶是靶标,这通过酶测定和遗传方法得到了验证。除了作为作用模式发现的有用工具外,组学方法还提供了有关植物毒素遗传和生化影响的详细信息。这些信息对于理解天然植物毒素在农业和自然生态系统中的全部影响可能很有用。