• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些新生儿治疗费用过高?重症监护中的卡莫西和配给制。

Which newborn infants are too expensive to treat? Camosy and rationing in intensive care.

机构信息

Robinson Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):502-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100745. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2012-100745
PMID:23355229
Abstract

Are there some newborn infants whose short- and long-term care costs are so great that treatment should not be provided and they should be allowed to die? Public discourse and academic debate about the ethics of newborn intensive care has often shied away from this question. There has been enough ink spilt over whether or when for the infant's sake it might be better not to provide life-saving treatment. The further question of not saving infants because of inadequate resources has seemed too difficult, too controversial, or perhaps too outrageous to even consider. However, Roman Catholic ethicist Charles Camosy has recently challenged this, arguing that costs should be a primary consideration in decision-making in neonatal intensive care. In the first part of this paper I will outline and critique Camosy's central argument, which he calls the 'social quality of life (sQOL)' model. Although there are some conceptual problems with the way the argument is presented, even those who do not share Camosy's Catholic background have good reason to accept his key point that resources should be considered in intensive care treatment decisions for all patients. In the second part of the paper, I explore the ways in which we might identify which infants are too expensive to treat. I argue that both traditional personal 'quality of life' and Camosy's 'sQOL' should factor into these decisions, and I outline two practical proposals.

摘要

是否存在一些新生儿,其短期和长期护理费用如此之高,以至于不应提供治疗,而应允许其死亡?公众讨论和学术辩论关于新生儿重症监护的伦理问题常常回避这个问题。已经有足够的笔墨讨论出于婴儿的利益,不提供救生治疗是否更好。不因为资源不足而拯救婴儿的进一步问题似乎太难、太有争议,或者太离谱而无法考虑。然而,罗马天主教伦理学家查尔斯·卡莫西(Charles Camosy)最近对此提出了质疑,他认为成本应成为新生儿重症监护决策中的主要考虑因素。在本文的第一部分,我将概述并批评卡莫西的核心论点,他称之为“社会生活质量(sQOL)”模型。尽管该论点的表述存在一些概念问题,但即使那些不认同卡莫西天主教背景的人也有充分的理由接受他的关键点,即资源应在所有患者的重症监护治疗决策中加以考虑。在本文的第二部分,我探讨了我们可能确定哪些婴儿治疗费用过高的方法。我认为,传统的个人“生活质量”和卡莫西的“sQOL”都应该成为这些决策的因素,并概述了两个实际建议。

相似文献

1
Which newborn infants are too expensive to treat? Camosy and rationing in intensive care.哪些新生儿治疗费用过高?重症监护中的卡莫西和配给制。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):502-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100745. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
2
Which newborns are too expensive to treat? A response to Dominic Wilkinson.哪些新生儿治疗费用过高?对多米尼克·威尔金森的回应。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):507-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100924. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
3
Extremely premature infants, scarcity and the COVID-19 pandemic.极早产儿、资源稀缺与新冠疫情
Acta Paediatr. 2021 Apr;110(4):1100-1103. doi: 10.1111/apa.15651. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Disability, discrimination and death: is it justified to ration life saving treatment for disabled newborn infants?残疾、歧视与死亡:对残疾新生儿的救命治疗进行资源分配是否合理?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2014 Mar-Jun;32(1-2):43-62. doi: 10.1007/s40592-014-0002-y.
5
The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.生命的神圣性、生活质量与新的“宝贝多伊”法案。
Linacre Q. 1985 Aug;52(3):258-70.
6
Too Expensive to Treat? Non-Treatment Decisions at the Margins of Viability.治疗成本过高?在生存边缘的不治疗决策。
Med Law Rev. 2019 Aug 1;27(3):461-481. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwy035.
7
The Intensive Care Lifeboat: a survey of lay attitudes to rationing dilemmas in neonatal intensive care.重症监护救生艇:一项关于公众对新生儿重症监护中资源分配困境态度的调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 8;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0152-y.
8
Reconciling ethical and legal aspects in neonatal intensive care.协调新生儿重症监护中的伦理与法律问题。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Oct;24 Suppl 1:126-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.607672. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
9
[A check list makes ethical decisions in care of premature infants easier].一份检查表使早产儿护理中的伦理决策更容易。
Lakartidningen. 2003 Jun 5;100(23):2046-9.
10
Rationing potentially inappropriate treatment in newborn intensive care in developed countries.发达国家对新生儿重症监护中潜在不适当治疗的配给。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Feb;23(1):52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Dilemmas in Postnatal Treatment of Severe Congenital Hydrocephalus.重度先天性脑积水产后治疗中的伦理困境
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016 Jan;25(1):84-92. doi: 10.1017/S0963180115000316.
2
Disability, discrimination and death: is it justified to ration life saving treatment for disabled newborn infants?残疾、歧视与死亡:对残疾新生儿的救命治疗进行资源分配是否合理?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2014 Mar-Jun;32(1-2):43-62. doi: 10.1007/s40592-014-0002-y.