残疾、歧视与死亡：对残疾新生儿的救命治疗进行资源分配是否合理？
Disability, discrimination and death: is it justified to ration life saving treatment for disabled newborn infants?
作者信息
Wilkinson Dominic, Savulescu Julian
出版信息
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2014 Mar-Jun;32(1-2):43-62. doi: 10.1007/s40592-014-0002-y.
Abstract
Disability might be relevant to decisions about life support in intensive care in several ways. It might affect the chance of treatment being successful, or a patient's life expectancy with treatment. It may affect whether treatment is in a patient's best interests. However, even if treatment would be of overall benefit it may be unaffordable and consequently unable to be provided. In this paper we will draw on the example of neonatal intensive care, and ask whether or when it is justified to ration life-saving treatment on the basis of disability. We argue that predicted disability is relevant both indirectly and directly to rationing decisions.
摘要
残疾可能在几个方面与重症监护中的生命支持决策相关。它可能会影响治疗成功的几率，或患者接受治疗后的预期寿命。它可能会影响治疗是否符合患者的最大利益。然而，即使治疗总体上有益，但可能费用过高，因此无法提供。在本文中，我们将以新生儿重症监护为例，探讨基于残疾来分配救命治疗是否合理以及何时合理。我们认为，预测的残疾与分配决策直接或间接都相关。
相似文献
1
Disability, discrimination and death: is it justified to ration life saving treatment for disabled newborn infants?残疾、歧视与死亡：对残疾新生儿的救命治疗进行资源分配是否合理？
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2014 Mar-Jun;32(1-2):43-62. doi: 10.1007/s40592-014-0002-y.
2
Which newborn infants are too expensive to treat? Camosy and rationing in intensive care.哪些新生儿治疗费用过高？重症监护中的卡莫西和配给制。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):502-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100745. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
3
Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?对于一个智障婴儿来说，死亡符合其最大利益吗？
J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug;32(8):454-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013508.
4
How much weight should we give to parental interests in decisions about life support for newborn infants?在关于新生儿生命维持的决策中，我们应该在多大程度上考虑父母的利益？
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2010 Sep;29(2):13.1-25. doi: 10.1007/BF03351523.
5
[A check list makes ethical decisions in care of premature infants easier].一份检查表使早产儿护理中的伦理决策更容易。
Lakartidningen. 2003 Jun 5;100(23):2046-9.
6
Deficiencies and Missed Opportunities to Formulate Clinical Guidelines in Australia for Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Severely Disabled and Impaired Infants.澳大利亚在制定针对严重残疾和受损婴儿的维持生命治疗的 withholding 或 withdrawing 的临床指南方面存在的不足和错失的机会。 （注：“withholding or withdrawing”常见释义为“ withholding 或 withdrawing”，在医学语境中可能有更专业准确的含义，这里先按字面翻译）
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Sep;12(3):449-59. doi: 10.1007/s11673-014-9572-x. Epub 2014 Aug 31.
7
Neonatal decision-making: beyond the standard of best interests.新生儿决策：超越最佳利益标准
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Feb;11(2):44-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.556979.
8
Withholding hydration and nutrition in newborns.新生儿的液体和营养 withhold（ withholding 为其现在分词形式，原意为“扣留；克制；不给” ，这里结合语境表示不给新生儿提供液体和营养）
Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(5):443-51. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9049-6.
9
Which newborns are too expensive to treat? A response to Dominic Wilkinson.哪些新生儿治疗费用过高？对多米尼克·威尔金森的回应。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):507-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100924. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
10
Ethical Problems in Decision Making in the Neonatal ICU.新生儿重症监护病房决策中的伦理问题
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1851-1860. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1801063.
引用本文的文献
1
Beyond the healthcare system: The societal and contextual factors impacting parents' participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions.超越医疗体系：影响有危及生命状况的新生儿父母参与决策的社会和背景因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0309914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309914. eCollection 2024.
2
A Delphi study to explore clinician and lived experience perspectives on setting priorities in eating disorder services.德尔菲研究探索临床医生和患者生活体验在饮食障碍服务中的优先事项设定。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08170-4.
3
Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-ethical or unethical?儿科重症监护病房的资源分配——合乎伦理还是不合乎伦理？
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2836-2844. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-334.
4
Global and regional levels and trends of child and adolescent morbidity from 2000 to 2016: an analysis of years lost due to disability (YLDs).全球和区域儿童和青少年发病率水平及趋势：2000 年至 2016 年残疾所致年数损失（YLDs）分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004996.
5
"Quality of life": parent and neonatologist perspectives.“生活质量”：家长和新生儿科医生的观点。
J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1809-1820. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0654-9. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
6
Treatment Decisions for Babies with Trisomy 13 and 18.13三体和18三体综合征患儿的治疗决策
HEC Forum. 2017 Sep;29(3):213-222. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9319-2.
7
The Intensive Care Lifeboat: a survey of lay attitudes to rationing dilemmas in neonatal intensive care.重症监护救生艇：一项关于公众对新生儿重症监护中资源分配困境态度的调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 8;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0152-y.
8
Genomic intensive care: should we perform genome testing in critically ill newborns?基因组重症监护：我们应该对危重新生儿进行基因组检测吗？
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Mar;101(2):F94-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308568. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
本文引用的文献
1
Should long-term ventilation be offered in severe spinal muscular atrophy.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Oct;49(10):813-4. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12380.
2
Spinal muscular atrophy type I: do the benefits of ventilation compensate for its burdens?I型脊髓性肌萎缩症：通气的益处能否抵消其负担？
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Oct;49(10):807-12. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12386.
3
Will this be a life worth living.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Oct;49(10):793-4. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12379.
4
Perinatal management of trisomy 18: a survey of obstetricians in Australia, New Zealand and the UK.18三体综合征的围产期管理：对澳大利亚、新西兰和英国产科医生的一项调查。
Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jan;34(1):42-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.4249. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
5
Precision and the rules of prioritization.精准度与优先级规则。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2013 Oct;22(4):336-45. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000182. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
6
Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome.先天性中枢性低通气综合征。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013 Nov 1;189(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 May 18.
7
Which newborn infants are too expensive to treat? Camosy and rationing in intensive care.哪些新生儿治疗费用过高？重症监护中的卡莫西和配给制。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):502-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100745. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
8
Modes of death in pediatrics: differences in the ethical approach in neonatal and pediatric patients.儿科的死亡模式：新生儿和儿科患者的伦理方法差异。
J Pediatr. 2013 Jun;162(6):1107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
9
Living with locked-in syndrome: an explorative study on health care situation, communication and quality of life.与闭锁综合征患者共同生活：一项关于医疗状况、沟通和生活质量的探索性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 May;35(9):713-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.705950. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
10
Just dying: the futility of futility.《传道书》：虚空的虚空，凡事都是虚空。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Sep;39(9):583-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100683. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
Zotero 插件