Douglas A S, Hunter W C, Wiseman M D
Department of Mechanical Engineering, G.W.C. Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
J Biomech. 1990;23(4):331-41. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90061-7.
This article quantifies the errors inherent in the measurement of myocardial strain in the canine left ventricle when the motion of four radiopaque marker beads is used to determine this strain. These errors are introduced because the strain is strongly inhomogeneous and only an averaged value of this strain can be determined by measuring the displacements of four points with finite separation. In this work, the error in the principal strains has been estimated by modeling the primary deformation components of the left ventricle and comparing the true strains obtained from these models with the strains computed according to the protocol typically used in experimental studies to determine strain from the motion of marker beads. Both a cylindrical and a spherical model of the left ventricle are used. For the cylindrical model, it is found that the traditional tetrahedra used may give errors as high as 20% in the maximum principal strain. A six-marker prism is found to give more consistent results, underestimating the maximum principal strain, which is in the radial direction, by no more than 8% in almost all cases. The spherical model, having double curvature, gives larger errors. In both models, the error in the other two principal strains was usually less than 5%. Furthermore, the principal strain directions were correct to within 6 degrees.
本文对利用四个不透射线标记珠的运动来测定犬左心室心肌应变时,心肌应变测量中固有的误差进行了量化。引入这些误差是因为应变强烈不均匀,通过测量有限间距的四个点的位移只能确定该应变的平均值。在这项工作中,通过对左心室的主要变形分量进行建模,并将从这些模型获得的真实应变与根据实验研究中通常用于从标记珠运动确定应变的方案计算出的应变进行比较,估算了主应变中的误差。使用了左心室的圆柱模型和球形模型。对于圆柱模型,发现所使用的传统四面体在最大主应变中可能产生高达20%的误差。发现六标记棱柱能给出更一致的结果,在几乎所有情况下,低估沿径向方向的最大主应变不超过8%。具有双曲率的球形模型产生的误差更大。在两个模型中,另外两个主应变的误差通常小于5%。此外,主应变方向的误差在6度以内。