Heneghan Cara, Wright John, Watson Gilli
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):324-40. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1834. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
Background Reflective practice groups have been recommended for improving staff wellbeing and team functioning in inpatient psychiatric services, and clinical psychologists have been identified as potential leaders in this type of work. Research is limited with little information about reflective practice group guidelines, prevalence and effectiveness. Aims The aims of this study were to describe clinical psychologists' practice in reflective groups for staff in inpatient psychiatric services and to explore how such groups are conceptualized and implemented. Methods Online questionnaires and follow-up interviews were used to gain broad descriptions of practice and in-depth information about participants' experiences. The sample consisted of 73 clinical psychologists working in the UK, six of whom were interviewed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, content analysis and thematic analysis. Results Clinical psychologists regularly facilitate reflective staff groups in inpatient psychiatric settings in the UK. Common outcomes related to staff wellbeing, service culture and teamwork. Engagement, group dynamics and lack of management support were common challenges. Group experiences were influenced by the organizational context. Conclusions Clinical psychologists' practices regarding reflective staff groups were in line with recent professional developments. Several difficulties were described, which may be indicative of both a difficulty inherent to the task and a training gap in reflective staff group process. The study had methodological limitations but offers a useful contribution to the literature, and enables practice and training implications to be drawn. The need for further research exploring facilitator characteristics, views of group participants and the impact of reflective staff groups on patients is indicated.
The term 'reflective practice group' encompasses a range of practices, but a typical group structure was found with common aims, outcomes and challenges. Reflective staff groups are regularly facilitated by clinical psychologists in inpatient psychiatric settings in the UK and are influenced by practitioner experience as well as psychodynamic, systemic and group process theories. The safety required for reflective groups to function is influenced by the organizational context, and groups can contribute to shifts in culture toward including psychosocial perspectives. Reflective staff groups represent one type of contribution to an inpatient psychiatric service and team relationships; other processes to encourage alternative professional perspectives and values might also support change. More research is recommended to explore facilitator characteristics, the views of staff teams on reflective staff groups and the impact of these groups on patients.
背景 推荐采用反思性实践小组来改善住院精神科服务中的员工福祉和团队运作,临床心理学家被视为这类工作的潜在领导者。相关研究有限,关于反思性实践小组的指导方针、普及率和有效性的信息很少。目的 本研究的目的是描述临床心理学家在为住院精神科服务员工开展的反思性小组中的实践情况,并探讨此类小组是如何被概念化和实施的。方法 采用在线问卷和后续访谈来获取实践的广泛描述以及关于参与者经历的深入信息。样本包括在英国工作的73名临床心理学家,其中6人接受了访谈。使用描述性统计、内容分析和主题分析对数据进行分析。结果 在英国,临床心理学家经常在住院精神科环境中推动员工反思性小组的开展。常见的成果与员工福祉、服务文化和团队合作有关。参与度、小组动态和缺乏管理支持是常见的挑战。小组经历受到组织背景的影响。结论 临床心理学家在员工反思性小组方面的实践与近期的专业发展一致。描述了一些困难,这可能既表明了任务本身的难度,也表明了反思性员工小组过程中的培训差距。该研究存在方法上的局限性,但对文献做出了有益贡献,并得出了实践和培训方面的启示。指出需要进一步研究探索促进者的特征、小组参与者的观点以及反思性员工小组对患者的影响。
“反思性实践小组”一词涵盖了一系列实践,但发现了一种典型的小组结构,具有共同的目标、成果和挑战。在英国,临床心理学家经常在住院精神科环境中推动员工反思性小组的开展,这些小组受到从业者经验以及心理动力学、系统和小组过程理论的影响。反思性小组运作所需的安全性受到组织背景的影响,并且小组可以促进文化转变,纳入社会心理视角。反思性员工小组是对住院精神科服务和团队关系的一种贡献;鼓励其他专业视角和价值观的其他过程也可能支持变革。建议进行更多研究,以探索促进者的特征、员工团队对反思性员工小组的看法以及这些小组对患者的影响。