Suppr超能文献

一项范围综述方案,旨在梳理医疗保健专业人员在医疗团队环境中使用行动研究方法的相关证据。

A scoping review protocol to map the evidence on the use of action research methodology by healthcare professionals and in healthcare team settings.

作者信息

Roberts Kinley, Casey Mary, Coghlan David, Cornall Catherine, Hudson Clare, Stokes Diarmuid, Carroll Aine

机构信息

National Rehabilitation Hospital, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, A96 E2H2, Ireland.

School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 C7X2, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2021 Jul 5;4:68. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13275.1. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Action research (AR) starts with an existing practical situation with which there is a concern or potential for improvement. It seeks transformative change through the simultaneous process of doing research and undertaking actions, both of which are linked together by a critical reflective process. It simultaneously allows one to systematically investigate a given social situation while promoting democratic change and collaborative participation. AR approaches have been used for many years in business management and education. More recently, AR has become an increasingly popular method of inquiry in healthcare, particularly in nursing, to investigate professional practice while simultaneously; introducing innovations; planning and undertaking action; and evaluating new ideas. The overall goal is to augment collaboration whilst improving the patient experience and outcomes. The Arksey and O'Malley methodology framework will be used to guide this scoping review process: stage 1 will identify the research questions; the eligibility criteria and search strategy will be defined in stage 2; studies will then be selected in stage 3; data will be extracted and charted from these included studies in stage 4; stage 5 involves aggregating and summarising these results along with criteria relevant for health professionals and policy-makers. An optional consultation (stage 6) exercise may potentially be included. This scoping review will comprehensively map the evidence on the use of AR methodology by healthcare professionals and in healthcare team settings. It is predicted that the findings will inform researchers in carrying out future AR and highlight gaps in the literature. An article reporting the results of the completed scoping review will be submitted for publication to a scientific journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences.

摘要

行动研究(AR)始于一个存在问题或有改进潜力的实际情况。它通过同时进行研究和采取行动的过程来寻求变革性的改变,这两个过程通过批判性反思过程联系在一起。它同时允许人们系统地研究特定的社会情况,同时促进民主变革和协作参与。行动研究方法在商业管理和教育领域已经使用多年。最近,行动研究在医疗保健领域,特别是在护理领域,已成为一种越来越受欢迎的探究方法,用于调查专业实践,同时引入创新、规划和采取行动以及评估新想法。总体目标是加强协作,同时改善患者体验和治疗结果。将使用阿克西和奥马利的方法框架来指导这一范围界定审查过程:第1阶段将确定研究问题;第2阶段将定义纳入标准和搜索策略;然后在第3阶段选择研究;第4阶段将从这些纳入的研究中提取数据并制成图表;第5阶段包括汇总和总结这些结果以及与卫生专业人员和政策制定者相关的标准。可能会纳入一个可选的咨询(第6阶段)活动。这项范围界定审查将全面梳理关于医疗保健专业人员在医疗团队环境中使用行动研究方法的证据。预计研究结果将为研究人员开展未来的行动研究提供参考,并突出文献中的空白。一篇报告完成的范围界定审查结果的文章将提交给科学期刊发表,并在相关的国家和国际会议上展示。

相似文献

4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Suicidal behaviours and moderator support in online health communities: protocol for a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):e034162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034162.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating value complexity in care pathway development: a qualitative case study.
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e098157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098157.
2
The psychosocial implication of childhood constipation on the children and family: A scoping review protocol.
HRB Open Res. 2024 Jun 18;6:48. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13713.1. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
2
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Managing and Coding References for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews in EndNote.
Med Ref Serv Q. 2017 Jan-Mar;36(1):19-31. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1259891.
4
Use of Action Research in Nursing Education.
Nurs Res Pract. 2016;2016:8749167. doi: 10.1155/2016/8749167. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
5
Power and glory: applying participatory action research in public health.
Gac Sanit. 2016 Nov-Dec;30(6):405-407. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
6
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
7
Interprofessional teamwork and team interventions in chronic care: A systematic review.
J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):15-28. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1051616. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
8
Action research methodology in the health care field: a scoping review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep 16;13(8):70-8. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2204.
9
Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work.
Hum Resour Health. 2013 May 10;11:19. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-19.
10
Clinical psychologists' experiences of reflective staff groups in inpatient psychiatric settings: a mixed methods study.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):324-40. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1834. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验