Hornik-Lurie Tzipi, Shalev Anat, Haknazar Lior, Garber Epstein Paula, Ziedenberg-Rehav Linor, Moran Galia S
The Falk Institute for Mental Health Studies, Kfar Shaul Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Spitzer Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):569-581. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12502. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Recovery-oriented care is a means of providing mental health treatment, focused on the patient's individual needs and active involvement in one's own care. However, this approach presents with challenges, particularly in psychiatric hospitals, which tend to be focused on symptom reduction. WHAT DOES THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This study examines the influence of three different recovery-oriented training programmes/interventions (namely, illness management and recovery, peer support, and psychiatric advance directives) on the attitudes and practice of mental health staff (including nurses) in an inpatient setting, using a mixed-methods methodology. We quantitatively assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices developed following recovery-oriented training, compared to staff not trained in these interventions. We interviewed staff exposed to the different interventions to learn about their personal views and characterized the benefits and challenges they experienced. Mainly, the illness management and recovery training created a positive change in the work attitude and some work-related practices of mental health staff and the increased presence of a person-centred approach supporting patient autonomy. However, and contrary to expectations, there was no increase in practices that support personal goals or provide individually tailored services. Peer support had an experiential impact among mental health staff, initiating a more humane, positive approach to patients. Psychiatric advance directives were reported as more challenging to implement and with limited impact. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Recovery-oriented trainings can be internalized and implemented by staff in medical model psychiatric settings. Despite recovery-oriented training, challenges do occur-notably, they are hardest to implement in acute wards/patient states and by psychiatric nurses. Using multiple recovery-oriented programmes/interventions can accelerate the momentum for change in traditional settings and promote positive practice. Ongoing comprehensive mental health staff training on recovery-oriented care programmes is essential in order to sustain change over time. Training is not enough in itself-hospital administrations need to be actively involved in promoting recovery-oriented policies. ABSTRACT: Introduction Developing person-centred recovery-oriented care is a challenge in mental health systems, particularly psychiatric hospitals. Aim To assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices developed following recovery-oriented training of nurses and other staff; to identify the benefits and challenges involved in the implementation of recovery-oriented intervention in psychiatric wards. Method A mixed-methods study compared recovery knowledge, attitudes and practices of 37 mental health ward staff trained in recovery-oriented intervention, against 35 staff not trained. Fifteen staff were interviewed about their experiences, and protocols were qualitatively analysed. Results The quantitative outcomes partially confirmed positive changes in attitudes and some practices. Qualitative interviews complemented these findings, revealing greater use of a person-centred approach and support for patient autonomy. However, we did not find differences between groups in quantitative outcomes pertaining to personal goals or providing individually tailored services. Discussion This study validates the implementation of recovery training and practices in psychiatric settings, and identifies the challenges involved. We discuss psychiatric nurse conflicts in implementation in acute wards. Implications for practice Our findings support the need for broader staff training in recovery-oriented interventions. Recruiting the support of the hospital administration for recovery-oriented intervention programmes is key, both ethically and structurally.
以康复为导向的护理是一种提供心理健康治疗的方式,专注于患者的个体需求以及患者积极参与自身护理。然而,这种方法存在挑战,尤其是在精神病医院,这类医院往往侧重于症状缓解。
本研究采用混合方法,考察了三种不同的以康复为导向的培训项目/干预措施(即疾病管理与康复、同伴支持和精神科预先指示)对住院环境下心理健康工作人员(包括护士)的态度和实践的影响。与未接受这些干预培训的工作人员相比,我们定量评估了接受以康复为导向的培训后所形成的知识、态度和实践。我们对接触不同干预措施的工作人员进行访谈,以了解他们的个人观点,并描述他们所经历的益处和挑战。主要而言,疾病管理与康复培训使心理健康工作人员的工作态度和一些与工作相关的实践产生了积极变化,并且以患者为中心的方法支持患者自主权的情况有所增加。然而,与预期相反,支持个人目标或提供个性化服务的实践并没有增加。同伴支持在心理健康工作人员中产生了体验性影响,引发了对患者更人道、积极的态度。据报告,精神科预先指示实施起来更具挑战性且影响有限。
以康复为导向的培训可被医疗模式精神病环境中的工作人员内化并实施。尽管有以康复为导向的培训,但挑战依然存在——值得注意的是,在急症病房/患者状态下以及由精神科护士实施时,这些挑战最难克服。采用多种以康复为导向的项目/干预措施可加快传统环境中的变革势头并促进积极实践。持续对心理健康工作人员进行关于以康复为导向的护理项目的全面培训对于长期维持变革至关重要。培训本身并不够——医院管理部门需要积极参与推广以康复为导向的政策。
引言 在心理健康系统,尤其是精神病医院,发展以患者为中心的、以康复为导向的护理是一项挑战。目的 评估护士和其他工作人员接受以康复为导向的培训后所形成的知识、态度和实践;确定在精神病房实施以康复为导向的干预措施所涉及的益处和挑战。方法 一项混合方法研究比较了37名接受以康复为导向的干预培训的心理健康病房工作人员与35名未接受培训的工作人员的康复知识、态度和实践。对15名工作人员进行了关于他们经历的访谈,并对访谈记录进行了定性分析。结果 定量结果部分证实了态度和一些实践方面的积极变化。定性访谈对这些发现进行了补充,揭示了更多地采用以患者为中心的方法以及对患者自主权的支持。然而,我们未发现两组在与个人目标或提供个性化服务相关的定量结果方面存在差异。讨论 本研究验证了在精神病环境中实施康复培训和实践的情况,并确定了其中涉及的挑战。我们讨论了精神科护士在急症病房实施过程中的冲突。对实践的启示 我们的研究结果支持有必要对工作人员进行更广泛的以康复为导向的干预培训。在道德和结构层面,争取医院管理部门对以康复为导向的干预项目的支持是关键。