• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植受者 12 小时肌酐清除率与估算肾小球滤过率的比较。

Comparison of 12-hour creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14215, USA.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 2013;35(3):333-7. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2012.757824. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

DOI:10.3109/0886022X.2012.757824
PMID:23356545
Abstract

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is an essential clinical assessment of renal function post-renal transplantation. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) measured over 12 h and estimated GFR (e-GFR) (calculated by the Modification of diet in renal disease equation) were compared in 28 stable renal transplant recipients (RTRs). This single center study included 14 African American (AA) and 14 Caucasian (CC) recipients. The 12-h creatinine clearance (CrCl-12 h) was determined by monitored urine collection and by e-GFR on two occasions (two phases) separated by at least 2 weeks. Statistics included mixed model analysis of CrCl-12 h and e-GFR relative to race, phase, and difference between parameters. In the first phase, the e-GFR was higher in AA males (58.4 ± 14.8 mL/min) than the CC males (46.2 ± 10.2 mL/min) (p = 0.032), whereas the CrCl-12 h of AA males (70.8 ± 8.7 mL/min) and CC males (63.3 ± 21.7 mL/min) was not different (p = 0.740). During the second phase, the e-GFR in AA and CC RTRs was 55.4 ± 10.1 mL/min and 47.6 ± 10.7 mL/min (p = 0.117), respectively, whereas CrCl-12 h in AAs was 64.71 ± 17.9 mL/min and in CCs was 62.0 ± 14.9 mL/min (p = 1.000). The CrCl-12 h was higher than the e-GFR (p < 0.001) irrespective of race or phase. CrCl-12 h was not different on both occasions (p = 0.289) in all the patients. CrCl-12 h was consistently greater than e-GFR. The difference between these e-GFR estimates may have an importance in the care of RTRs.

摘要

肾小球滤过率(GFR)是肾移植后评估肾功能的重要临床指标。本研究对 28 例稳定的肾移植受者(RTR)进行了 12 小时肌酐清除率(CrCl-12 h)和估算肾小球滤过率(e-GFR)(通过肾脏病饮食改良公式计算)的比较。该单中心研究包括 14 例非裔美国人(AA)和 14 例白种人(CC)受者。12 小时肌酐清除率(CrCl-12 h)通过监测尿液收集和两次 e-GFR 检测(两个阶段)来确定,两次检测至少间隔 2 周。统计学分析包括混合模型分析 CrCl-12 h 和 e-GFR 与种族、阶段和参数差异的关系。在第一阶段,AA 男性的 e-GFR(58.4 ± 14.8 mL/min)高于 CC 男性(46.2 ± 10.2 mL/min)(p = 0.032),而 AA 男性(70.8 ± 8.7 mL/min)和 CC 男性(63.3 ± 21.7 mL/min)的 CrCl-12 h 无差异(p = 0.740)。在第二阶段,AA 和 CC RTRs 的 e-GFR 分别为 55.4 ± 10.1 mL/min 和 47.6 ± 10.7 mL/min(p = 0.117),而 AA 的 CrCl-12 h 为 64.71 ± 17.9 mL/min,CC 为 62.0 ± 14.9 mL/min(p = 1.000)。CrCl-12 h 高于 e-GFR(p < 0.001),无论种族或阶段如何。所有患者两次检测的 CrCl-12 h 无差异(p = 0.289)。CrCl-12 h 始终大于 e-GFR。这些 e-GFR 估计值之间的差异可能对 RTR 的护理具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Comparison of 12-hour creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients.肾移植受者 12 小时肌酐清除率与估算肾小球滤过率的比较。
Ren Fail. 2013;35(3):333-7. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2012.757824. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
2
Creatinine clearance as a measure of GFR in screenees for the African-American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension pilot study.在非裔美国人肾脏疾病与高血压先导研究中,将肌酐清除率作为筛查对象肾小球滤过率的一项衡量指标。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Jul;32(1):32-42. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9669421.
3
Assessing glomerular filtration rate in healthy Indian adults: a comparison of various prediction equations.评估健康印度成年人的肾小球滤过率:各种预测方程的比较。
J Nephrol. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):257-61.
4
Utility of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations in Assessing Renal Allograft Function: Are They Accurate?估算肾小球滤过率方程在评估肾移植功能中的应用:它们准确吗?
Transplant Proc. 2022 Mar;54(2):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
5
Concordance between glomerular filtration rate estimation equations and 4-hour urinary creatinine clearance in critically ill patients with severe trauma.严重创伤危重症患者肾小球滤过率估算方程与 4 小时尿肌酐清除率的一致性。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2023 Aug-Sep;70(7):381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
6
Evaluation of renal function in intensive care: plasma cystatin C vs. creatinine and derived glomerular filtration rate estimates.重症监护中肾功能的评估:血浆胱抑素C与肌酐及估算的肾小球滤过率对比
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(9):953-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.163.
7
Potential Effect of Substituting Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate for Estimated Creatinine Clearance for Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.估算肾小球滤过率替代估算肌酐清除率用于直接口服抗凝剂剂量调整的潜在影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):1996-2002. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14288. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
Assessing suitability for renal donation: can equations predicting glomerular filtration rate substitute for a reference method in the Indian population?评估肾脏捐献的适宜性:预测肾小球滤过率的公式能否替代印度人群中的参考方法?
Nephron Clin Pract. 2005;101(3):c128-33. doi: 10.1159/000086683. Epub 2005 Jul 5.
9
A comparison of measured creatinine clearance versus calculated glomerular filtration rate for assessment of renal function before autologous and allogeneic BMT.自体和异基因骨髓移植前评估肾功能时实测肌酐清除率与计算肾小球滤过率的比较。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 May;15(5):574-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.01.015.
10
Assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury--true GFR versus urinary creatinine clearance and estimating equations.评估急性肾损伤危重症患者的肾小球滤过率(GFR)——真实GFR与尿肌酐清除率及估算方程的比较
Crit Care. 2013 Jun 15;17(3):R108. doi: 10.1186/cc12777.