Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
West J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;13(5):383-7. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.12.6748.
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) of a new protocol for intravenous (IV)-contrast only abdominal/pelvic computed tomography (ABCT) compared to historical controls.
This was a retrospective case-controlled study performed at a single academic medical center. Patients ≥ 18 undergoing ABCT imaging for non-traumatic abdominal pain were included in the study. We compared ED LOS between historical controls undergoing ABCT imaging with PO/IV contrast and study patients undergoing an IV-contrast-only protocol. Imaging indications were the same for both groups and included patients with clinical suspicion for appendicitis, diverticulitis, small bowel obstruction, or perforation. We identified all patients from the hospital's electronic storehouse (imaging code, ordering department, imaging times), and we abstracted ED LOS and disposition from electronic medical records.
Two hundred and eleven patients who underwent PO/IV ABCT prep were compared to 184 patients undergoing IV-contrast only ABCT prep. ED LOS was shorter for patients imaged with the IV-contrast only protocol (4:35 hrs vs. 6:39 hrs, p < 0.0001).
Implementation of an IV-contrast only ABCT prep for select ED patients presenting for evaluation of acute abdominal pain significantly decreased ED LOS.
本研究旨在探讨与历史对照相比,新的静脉(IV)造影剂仅用于腹部/盆腔计算机断层扫描(ABCT)的方案对急诊部(ED)住院时间(LOS)的影响。
这是在一家学术医疗中心进行的回顾性病例对照研究。纳入了年龄≥18 岁、因非创伤性腹痛而行 ABCT 成像的患者。我们比较了接受 PO/IV 造影剂 ABCT 成像的历史对照患者和接受 IV 造影剂仅方案的研究患者的 ED LOS。两组的成像指征相同,包括有阑尾炎、憩室炎、小肠梗阻或穿孔临床怀疑的患者。我们从医院的电子仓库(成像代码、订单部门、成像时间)中识别所有患者,并从电子病历中提取 ED LOS 和处置信息。
将接受 PO/IV ABCT 准备的 211 名患者与接受 IV 造影剂仅 ABCT 准备的 184 名患者进行比较。接受 IV 造影剂仅方案成像的患者 ED LOS 更短(4:35 小时比 6:39 小时,p < 0.0001)。
为急诊就诊评估急性腹痛的特定 ED 患者实施 IV 造影剂仅 ABCT 准备显著缩短了 ED LOS。