• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分期全经皮主动脉瓣病变和二尖瓣反流治疗:机构经验。

Staged total percutaneous treatment of aortic valve pathology and mitral regurgitation: institutional experience.

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Department of Cardiology at University Hospital Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;82(4):E552-63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24809. Epub 2013 May 25.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.24809
PMID:23359543
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To summarize our single Institution experience with staged total percutaneous management of aorto-mitral pathology.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous treatment of aortic valve stenosis (AVS) and mitral valve regurgitation (MVR) has been recently proposed for patients at high surgical risk.

METHODS

Data concerning consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous transcatheter AV implantation (TAVI) followed by MV repair with MitraClip® were prospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to February 2012 a total of 254 patients were referred to undergo TAVI in our Institution. Seventeen (6.7%) had preoperative severe MVR that remained unchanged after TAVI. Due to exacerbation of symptoms 12 patients were subsequently submitted to MV repair with the MitraClip® device. Mean age was 79 years (72-86 years), median Ambler score was 30.1 (17.2-42.6) and EuroSCORE 22.3 (10.2-48.6). Procedural success rate was 100%. Postprocedural hospitalization was 7.1 ± 2.7 and 4.6 ± 0.9 days after TAVI and MV repair, respectively. Six months follow-up echocardiography confirms improvement in LV-EF (37.2 ± 9.9 vs. 43.5 ± 10.7, P < 0.0001). No patient presents MVR exceeding grade I(+) or prosthetic aortic insufficiency > I grade and all patients experienced an improvement in functional status.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous treatment of AVS and MVR is feasible and safe. A tailored approach should be considered to treat firstly the AVS and subsequently the MVR when severe MV dysfunction and symptoms persist. Short-term durability of this combined percutaneous approach seems encouraging and justifies the economical burden to treat patients that have no other option.

摘要

目的

总结我们机构在经皮分期治疗主-二尖瓣病变方面的经验。

背景

经皮治疗主动脉瓣狭窄(AVS)和二尖瓣反流(MVR)最近已被提议用于高手术风险患者。

方法

前瞻性收集并分析了连续接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后接受 MitraClip®二尖瓣修复术的患者的数据。

结果

从 2010 年 1 月至 2012 年 2 月,共有 254 例患者在我院接受 TAVI。17 例(6.7%)术前有严重的 MVR,TAVI 后无变化。由于症状加重,12 例随后接受 MitraClip®装置进行 MV 修复。平均年龄为 79 岁(72-86 岁),中位数 Ambler 评分 30.1(17.2-42.6),EuroSCORE 22.3(10.2-48.6)。手术成功率为 100%。TAVI 和 MV 修复后住院时间分别为 7.1 ± 2.7 天和 4.6 ± 0.9 天。6 个月的超声心动图随访证实 LV-EF 改善(37.2 ± 9.9 与 43.5 ± 10.7,P <0.0001)。无患者出现 MVR 超过 I(+)级或人工主动脉瓣关闭不全> I 级,所有患者的功能状态均得到改善。

结论

经皮治疗 AVS 和 MVR 是可行和安全的。当严重的 MV 功能障碍和症状持续存在时,应考虑采用针对性方法首先治疗 AVS,然后治疗 MVR。这种联合经皮方法的短期耐久性似乎令人鼓舞,并证明了治疗没有其他选择的患者的经济负担是合理的。

相似文献

1
Staged total percutaneous treatment of aortic valve pathology and mitral regurgitation: institutional experience.分期全经皮主动脉瓣病变和二尖瓣反流治疗:机构经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct 1;82(4):E552-63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24809. Epub 2013 May 25.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation without balloon predilation: a single-center pilot experience.经导管主动脉瓣植入术无球囊预扩张:单中心初步经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug 1;82(2):292-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24805. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
3
Impact of aortic valve calcification on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry.主动脉瓣钙化对经导管主动脉瓣植入术结果的影响:前瞻性多中心德国 TAVI 注册研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):348-55. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24332. Epub 2012 May 4.
4
Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.严重左心室收缩功能障碍对经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后住院结局的影响:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 多中心研究倾向匹配人群的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
5
Early clinical outcome of aortic transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in the Nordic countries.北欧国家经导管主动脉瓣中瓣植入术的早期临床结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1047-54; discussion 1054. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.045. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
6
Impact of mitral regurgitation on clinical outcomes of patients with low-ejection fraction, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.二尖瓣反流对行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的低射血分数、低跨瓣压差重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床结局的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb;8(2):e001895. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001895.
7
Initial German experience with transapical implantation of a second-generation transcatheter heart valve for the treatment of aortic regurgitation.德国初步经验:经心尖植入第二代经导管心脏瓣膜治疗主动脉瓣反流。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct;7(10):1168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
8
Use of balloon expandable transcatheter valves for valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerative stentless aortic bioprostheses: Technical considerations and results.球囊扩张式经导管瓣膜用于退行性无支架主动脉生物瓣膜患者瓣膜中瓣膜植入术:技术要点与结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):917-22; discussion 922-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 May 16.
9
Surgical or percutaneous mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: comparison of patient characteristics and clinical outcomes.外科或经皮二尖瓣修复术治疗继发性二尖瓣反流:患者特征和临床结局比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Sep;44(3):490-6; discussion 496. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt036. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
10
The Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Mitral Regurgitation Regression in High-Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术对高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者二尖瓣反流消退的影响。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2015 Jul;24(4):439-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixed-Valve Disease: Management of Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation: Thresholds for Surgery Versus Percutaneous Therapies.混合瓣膜病:主动脉瓣狭窄合并二尖瓣反流患者的管理:手术与经皮治疗的阈值
US Cardiol. 2021 Nov 29;15:e26. doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.17. eCollection 2021.
2
When Aortic Stenosis Is Not Alone: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management in Mixed and Combined Valvular Disease.当主动脉瓣狭窄并非孤立存在时:混合性和联合性瓣膜病的流行病学、病理生理学、诊断与管理
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 15;8:744497. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.744497. eCollection 2021.
3
Prognosis of persistent mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后持续性二尖瓣反流患者的预后。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Oct;109(10):1261-1270. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01618-9. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
4
Sequential Percutaneous Approach for Severe Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation.用于重度二尖瓣和主动脉瓣反流的序贯经皮入路
Cureus. 2020 Jan 10;12(1):e6619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6619.
5
Is There Currently a Place for Combined Mitral and Aortic Transcatheter Interventions?目前是否有二尖瓣和主动脉经导管介入联合治疗的位置?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Sep 13;21(10):129. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1205-x.
6
Impact of Mitral Regurgitation on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.二尖瓣反流对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后临床结局的影响。
Interv Cardiol. 2016 May;11(1):54-58. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016:11:1.
7
Echocardiographic evaluation and guidance for MitraClip procedure.二尖瓣夹合术的超声心动图评估与指导
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Dec;7(6):616-632. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.07.04.
8
Should high risk patients with concomitant severe aortic stenosis and mitral valve disease undergo double valve surgery in the TAVR era?在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)时代,患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄和二尖瓣疾病的高危患者是否应接受双瓣膜手术?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Dec 29;12(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0688-z.
9
Mitro-aortic pathology: a point of view for a fully transcatheter staged approach.二尖瓣-主动脉病变:全经导管分期治疗方法的观点
Neth Heart J. 2017 Nov;25(11):605-608. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1028-6. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
10
Dynamics of Concomitant Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI.接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)的主动脉瓣狭窄患者合并功能性二尖瓣反流的动态变化
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016 Jul;32(4):477-84. doi: 10.6515/acs20150629c.