• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同终末冲洗液激活方案对 EDTA 和柠檬酸去除玷污层效果的影响。

Efficacy of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal by EDTA and citric acid.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Microsc Res Tech. 2013 Apr;76(4):364-9. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22175. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1002/jemt.22175
PMID:23362115
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different activation protocols for chelating agents used after chemo-mechanical preparation (CMP), for smear layer (SL) removal. Forty-five single-rooted human premolars with straight canals and fully formed apex were selected. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups depending on the chelating agent used for smear layer removal: distilled water (DW, control group); 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); and 10% citric acid (CA). Each group was further divided into three subgroups according to the activation protocol used: no-activation (NA), manual dynamic activation (MDA), or sonic activation (SA). After CMP, all specimens were sectioned and processed for observation of the apical thirds by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two calibrated evaluators attributed scores to each specimen. The differences between activation protocols were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used for comparison between each root canal third. When chelating agents were activated, either by MDA or SA, it was obtained the best cleaning results with no significant difference between EDTA and CA (P > 0.05). Sonic activation showed the best results when root canal thirds were analyzed, in comparison to MDA and NA groups (P < 0.05). The activation of chelating agents, independent of the protocol used, benefits smear layer removal from root canals.

摘要

本研究旨在评估化学机械预备(CMP)后不同螯合剂激活方案对玷污层(SL)去除的影响。选择 45 颗具有直根管和完全形成根尖的单根人前磨牙。根据用于去除玷污层的螯合剂将标本随机分为三组:蒸馏水(DW,对照组);17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA);和 10%柠檬酸(CA)。每组根据使用的激活方案进一步分为三个亚组:无激活(NA)、手动动态激活(MDA)或超声激活(SA)。CMP 后,所有标本均进行分段处理,并通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察根尖三分之一。两位经过校准的评估员对每个标本进行评分。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析激活方案之间的差异。使用 Friedman 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较每个根管三分之一之间的差异。当螯合剂通过 MDA 或 SA 激活时,与 EDTA 和 CA 相比,获得了最佳的清洁效果,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与 MDA 和 NA 组相比,在分析根管三分之一时,超声激活显示出最佳效果(P<0.05)。无论使用何种方案,螯合剂的激活都有利于去除根管内的玷污层。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal by EDTA and citric acid.不同终末冲洗液激活方案对 EDTA 和柠檬酸去除玷污层效果的影响。
Microsc Res Tech. 2013 Apr;76(4):364-9. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22175. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
2
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.不同终末冲洗液激活方案对弯曲根管内玷污层去除效果的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.
3
Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.使用自调式锉时乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和MTAD去除碎屑及玷污层的效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.038. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
4
Chitosan: a new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation.壳聚糖:根管器械预备后去除玷污层的新方法。
Int Endod J. 2013 Apr;46(4):332-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02119.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
5
A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.次氯酸钠凝胶和溶液形式作为根管冲洗剂使用后对玷污层的比较扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1234-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
6
SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.使用 Sonicare CanalBrush 冲洗进行根管清创的扫描电镜评估。
Int Endod J. 2010 May;43(5):363-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01675.x.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal.三种螯合剂去除玷污层效果的比较。
J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):599-602. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.023.
8
The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和次氯酸钠(NaOCl)应用时间对根管内玷污层去除的影响:扫描电子显微镜分析
Int Endod J. 2005 May;38(5):285-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00930.x.
9
Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.比较马来酸和乙二胺四乙酸在去除器械处理人根管内玷污层的效果:扫描电镜研究。
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1573-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
10
Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.恒牙根管预备后使用SmearClear和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)去除玷污层效果的扫描电子显微镜初步研究
J Endod. 2008 Dec;34(12):1541-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Irrigants and irrigation activation systems in Endodontics.牙髓病学中的冲洗剂和冲洗激活系统。
Braz Dent J. 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):1-33. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305577.
2
Efficacy of preheated chelating agents on calcium ion removal from instrumented root canals.预热螯合剂对根管预备后根管内钙离子去除的效果。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Oct 1;13(10):e1015-e1020. doi: 10.4317/jced.58539. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Effect of different chelating agents and their surface tension on the amount of apically extruded debris.不同螯合剂及其表面张力对根尖挤出碎屑量的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Effect of different chelating agents on the bond strength of a silicone-based root canal sealer to root dentin.不同螯合剂对硅基根管封闭剂与牙根牙本质粘结强度的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;23(2):158-162. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_81_19. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Smear Layer Removal from Root Canal Dentin and Antimicrobial Effect of Citric Acid-modified Chlorhexidine.从根管牙本质中去除玷污层和柠檬酸改性氯己定的抗菌效果。
Eur Endod J. 2020 Dec;5(3):257-263. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.38258.
6
Effect of acidic solutions on the microhardness of dentin and set OrthoMTA and their cytotoxicity on murine macrophage.酸性溶液对牙本质和凝固型正硅酸四钙微硬度的影响及其对小鼠巨噬细胞的细胞毒性
Restor Dent Endod. 2016 Feb;41(1):12-21. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.1.12. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
7
Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.四种不同冲洗技术联合 60°C 3%次氯酸钠和 17% EDTA 对清除玷污层效果的比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Sep 8;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-114.
8
Synergistic antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine and ozone in endodontic treatment.洗必泰和臭氧在根管治疗中的协同抗菌作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:592423. doi: 10.1155/2014/592423. Epub 2014 May 28.