Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Microsc Res Tech. 2013 Apr;76(4):364-9. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22175. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different activation protocols for chelating agents used after chemo-mechanical preparation (CMP), for smear layer (SL) removal. Forty-five single-rooted human premolars with straight canals and fully formed apex were selected. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups depending on the chelating agent used for smear layer removal: distilled water (DW, control group); 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); and 10% citric acid (CA). Each group was further divided into three subgroups according to the activation protocol used: no-activation (NA), manual dynamic activation (MDA), or sonic activation (SA). After CMP, all specimens were sectioned and processed for observation of the apical thirds by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two calibrated evaluators attributed scores to each specimen. The differences between activation protocols were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used for comparison between each root canal third. When chelating agents were activated, either by MDA or SA, it was obtained the best cleaning results with no significant difference between EDTA and CA (P > 0.05). Sonic activation showed the best results when root canal thirds were analyzed, in comparison to MDA and NA groups (P < 0.05). The activation of chelating agents, independent of the protocol used, benefits smear layer removal from root canals.
本研究旨在评估化学机械预备(CMP)后不同螯合剂激活方案对玷污层(SL)去除的影响。选择 45 颗具有直根管和完全形成根尖的单根人前磨牙。根据用于去除玷污层的螯合剂将标本随机分为三组:蒸馏水(DW,对照组);17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA);和 10%柠檬酸(CA)。每组根据使用的激活方案进一步分为三个亚组:无激活(NA)、手动动态激活(MDA)或超声激活(SA)。CMP 后,所有标本均进行分段处理,并通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察根尖三分之一。两位经过校准的评估员对每个标本进行评分。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析激活方案之间的差异。使用 Friedman 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较每个根管三分之一之间的差异。当螯合剂通过 MDA 或 SA 激活时,与 EDTA 和 CA 相比,获得了最佳的清洁效果,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与 MDA 和 NA 组相比,在分析根管三分之一时,超声激活显示出最佳效果(P<0.05)。无论使用何种方案,螯合剂的激活都有利于去除根管内的玷污层。