Wilcox L M, Timney B, St John R
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Perception. 1990;19(1):43-55. doi: 10.1068/p190043.
There is conflicting evidence concerning the characteristics of binocular channels in the human visual system with respect to the existence of a 'pure' binocular channel that responds only to simultaneous stimulation of both eyes. Four experiments were conducted to resolve these discrepancies and to evaluate the evidence for the existence of such an exclusive binocular channel. In the first three studies, tilt aftereffects were measured after monocular adaptation. The relative sizes of the direct, interocularly transferred, and binocular aftereffects were not influenced by the configuration of the adapting pattern (experiment 1), or by the eye used for adaptation (experiment 2). There were also consistent interobserver differences in the relative sizes of the aftereffect seen after monocular adaptation (experiment 3). Taken together, these data raise questions about the appropriateness of a monocular adaptation paradigm for evaluating the presence of a pure binocular channel in observers with normal binocular vision. In experiment 4, in which the paradigm of alternating monocular adaptation was used, data were obtained that are consistent with the presence of a pure binocular channel.
关于人类视觉系统中双眼通道的特征,尤其是关于是否存在仅对双眼同时刺激做出反应的“纯”双眼通道,存在相互矛盾的证据。进行了四项实验来解决这些差异,并评估这种排他性双眼通道存在的证据。在前三项研究中,在单眼适应后测量倾斜后效。直接后效、双眼间转移后效和双眼后效的相对大小不受适应模式的配置(实验1)或用于适应的眼睛(实验2)的影响。单眼适应后观察到的后效相对大小在观察者之间也存在一致的差异(实验3)。综合来看,这些数据对单眼适应范式用于评估具有正常双眼视觉的观察者中纯双眼通道的存在是否合适提出了疑问。在实验4中,使用了交替单眼适应范式,获得的数据与纯双眼通道的存在相一致。