• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术短期手术结局比较:100 例患者的前瞻性、两中心病例对照研究。

Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy: a two-center, prospective case-controlled study of 100 patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2012;29(6):477-83. doi: 10.1159/000346044. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1159/000346044
PMID:23364285
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent case studies have demonstrated the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC). Few comparative studies for SILC and multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) have been conducted. The aim of this case-controlled study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between SILC and MLC for right-sided colectomies.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and February 2012, data from the first 50 consecutive patients that underwent right SILS at one of the two institutions were compared with a group of 50 consecutive patients that underwent right MLC in the same period.

RESULTS

Median operative time was significantly shorter in SILC (97 vs. 112 min; p < 0.001). Between both groups, no statistically significant differences were found regarding number and nature of short-term complications, number of reoperations [4 (8%) vs. 6 (12%)], and mortality rate [1 (2%) vs. 2 (4%)]. Median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days for both groups.

CONCLUSION

SILC is a safe and feasible procedure when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Length of hospital stay and overall complication rates are comparable with MLC. Until today, no clear advantages of SILC over MLC have been demonstrated. However, due to its smaller incisional trauma, SILC could be a major step in improving cosmetic outcomes.

摘要

背景

最近的病例研究已经证明了单孔腹腔镜结肠切除术(SILC)的可行性。很少有关于 SILC 和多孔腹腔镜结肠切除术(MLC)的比较研究。本病例对照研究的目的是比较 SILC 和 MLC 用于右半结肠切除术的短期手术结果。

方法

在 2010 年 1 月至 2012 年 2 月期间,对两个机构中 50 例连续接受右侧 SILS 的患者的资料与同期 50 例连续接受右侧 MLC 的患者的资料进行了比较。

结果

SILC 的中位手术时间明显缩短(97 分钟 vs. 112 分钟;p < 0.001)。两组之间,短期并发症的数量和性质、再次手术的数量[4 例(8%)vs. 6 例(12%)]以及死亡率[1 例(2%)vs. 2 例(4%)]均无统计学差异。两组的中位术后住院时间均为 6 天。

结论

对于有经验的腹腔镜外科医生来说,SILC 是一种安全可行的手术。住院时间和总体并发症发生率与 MLC 相当。到目前为止,SILC 尚未显示出明显优于 MLC 的优势。然而,由于其切口创伤较小,SILC 可能是改善美容效果的重要一步。

相似文献

1
Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy: a two-center, prospective case-controlled study of 100 patients.单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术短期手术结局比较:100 例患者的前瞻性、两中心病例对照研究。
Dig Surg. 2012;29(6):477-83. doi: 10.1159/000346044. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
2
Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison.单切口与标准多孔腹腔镜结肠切除术:一项多中心、病例对照比较研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):66-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182378442.
3
Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy.单切口腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:17 例连续病例的经验及与多孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1549-54. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e85875.
4
Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic colectomy and multiport laparoscopic colectomy.比较单切口腹腔镜结肠切除术与多端口腹腔镜结肠切除术的研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4697-4720. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4812-2. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术的比较。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(6):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 May 4.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.单孔腹腔镜结肠切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜结肠切除术的比较:荟萃分析的对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1537-0. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right and hand-assisted left colectomy: a case-matched comparison.单切口与多孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除和手助左半结肠切除的病例对照比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Nov;54(11):1355-61. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822c8d41.
8
A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer.单切口与多端口腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术的病例匹配比较。
Surg Today. 2016 Mar;46(3):297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1154-y. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques.单切口腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:与标准腹腔镜和手助腹腔镜技术的病例对照比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jul;213(1):72-80; discussion 80-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.010. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery vs. multiport laparoscopic surgery for colectomy: a meta-analysis of eleven recent studies.单切口腹腔镜手术与多端口腹腔镜手术治疗结肠切除术的比较:对十一项近期研究的荟萃分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jul-Aug;59(117):1345-9. doi: 10.5754/hge12156.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the short-term outcomes and cost between solo single-incision distal gastrectomy and conventional multiport totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.早期胃癌单孔单切口远端胃切除术与传统多孔全腹腔镜远端胃切除术的短期结局及成本比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Feb;100(2):67-75. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.2.67. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
2
Single-port laparoscopically harvested omental flap for immediate breast reconstruction.单孔腹腔镜下采集网膜瓣即刻乳房重建。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(2):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05848-3. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.
系统评价比较单切口与传统腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov 4;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1721-6.
4
European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)关于单切口内镜手术的共识声明。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):996-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06693-2. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
5
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials only exploring the role of single incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal resections.仅探讨单切口腹腔镜手术与传统多端口腹腔镜手术在结直肠切除术中作用的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May 29;3:30. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.05.05. eCollection 2018.
6
Single-incision Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.单孔腹腔镜胃癌切除术
J Gastric Cancer. 2017 Sep;17(3):193-203. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e29. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
7
Single-incision versus standard multi-incision laparoscopic colectomy in patients with malignant or benign colonic disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and assessment of the evidence.单切口与标准多切口腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗恶性或良性结肠疾病患者:一项系统评价、荟萃分析及证据评估
BMC Surg. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0187-5.
8
Surgical approach to right colon cancer: From open technique to robot. State of art.右结肠癌的手术方法:从开放技术到机器人手术。最新进展。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Aug 27;8(8):564-73. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i8.564.
9
Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic colectomy and multiport laparoscopic colectomy.比较单切口腹腔镜结肠切除术与多端口腹腔镜结肠切除术的研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4697-4720. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4812-2. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for children with Crohn's disease.针对克罗恩病患儿的单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 May;32(5):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3875-4. Epub 2016 Feb 13.