Suppr超能文献

单切口与多孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除和手助左半结肠切除的病例对照比较。

Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right and hand-assisted left colectomy: a case-matched comparison.

机构信息

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Nov;54(11):1355-61. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822c8d41.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New technology for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy is now commercially available, yet advantages of this approach over multiport laparoscopic colectomy have not been demonstrated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent single-incision vs multiport laparoscopic colectomies.

DESIGN

Consecutive patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic colectomies were case matched to patients who underwent multiport laparoscopic colectomies by age, operation, surgeon, diagnosis, and body mass index. Data from a prospective database and the medical records of patients treated were reviewed.

SETTINGS

This study took place at 2 tertiary care hospitals.

PATIENTS

Forty-six consecutive patients with a body mass index of 24 underwent single-incision laparoscopic colectomies (24 right, 18 sigmoid, 4 low anterior resection).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Perioperative outcomes and cosmesis and body image scores at 90 days were compared.

RESULTS

The largest incision length was significantly shorter for the single-incision group. Two patients with single incisions were converted to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and 4 required placement of a 5-mm trocar. A significantly greater portion of the operation was performed by the attending surgeons in the single-incision group. For right colectomies, operative times were similar. For left colectomies, operative time (149 ± 30 vs 126 ± 21 min) was significantly longer for the single-incision group. Time to flatus and bowel movements were significantly shorter for the single-incision group, but length of stay was similar. Cosmetic score was higher for the single-incision group (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Single incision is equivalent to multiport laparoscopic colectomy with regard to safety and efficacy with smaller incision size and higher cosmetic scores. Operative times were equivalent, although a greater portion of the operation was performed by the attending surgeons in the single-incision group. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the advantages of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy.

摘要

背景

单切口腹腔镜结直肠切除术的新技术现已商业化,但与多孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术相比,其优势尚未得到证实。

目的

本研究旨在比较单切口与多孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术患者的治疗效果。

设计

通过年龄、手术、外科医生、诊断和体重指数,对接受单切口腹腔镜结直肠切除术的连续患者进行病例匹配,与接受多孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术的患者进行匹配。回顾了前瞻性数据库和患者治疗记录的数据。

地点

这项研究在 2 家三级护理医院进行。

患者

46 例连续患者的体重指数为 24,接受单切口腹腔镜结直肠切除术(24 例右半结肠切除术、18 例乙状结肠切除术、4 例低位前切除术)。

主要观察指标

比较围手术期结果和 90 天时的美容和身体形象评分。

结果

单切口组的最大切口长度明显更短。2 例单切口患者转为手助腹腔镜手术,4 例患者需要放置 5mm 套管。单切口组的手术主要由主治医生完成的比例明显更大。对于右半结肠切除术,手术时间相似。对于左半结肠切除术,单切口组的手术时间(149±30 分钟比 126±21 分钟)明显更长。单切口组的肛门排气和排便时间明显更短,但住院时间相似。单切口组的美容评分更高(P=0.03)。

结论

单切口与多孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术在安全性和疗效方面相当,切口更小,美容评分更高。手术时间相当,但单切口组的手术主要由主治医生完成。需要进一步前瞻性研究来评估单切口腹腔镜结直肠切除术的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验