Creighton Sara, Hafner John W, Aldag Jean C
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Feb;29(2):156-61. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182808abe.
The population demographics found in many urban emergency departments (EDs) often mirrors those of children at risk for elevated serum lead levels. We evaluated the effectiveness of a verbal lead screening program for screening high-risk children presenting to the ED.
A prospective observational cohort study was conducted of children aged 9 months to 6 years, living in 2 target counties and presenting to an urban, academic, Midwestern ED. Those with a prior lead level, enrolled in a program requiring lead testing, or with an unstable medical condition were excluded. A 6-question validated verbal survey was administered to all parents of eligible children, and the results recorded in the patient's electronic medical record. Children who screened positive were referred to their local health department for blood lead testing. Health department records were reviewed for follow-up visits and blood lead levels.
During the study period, 3513 children were eligible (mean age, 2.6 years; 53.3% male), with 815 patients screened and 209 (25.6%) screening positive. Most positively screened patients (71.8%) documented only 1 affirmative question, most often indicating they lived in a home built before 1978. Of those children who screened positive, 14.8% (31/209) had a blood lead level performed within 6 months. Of those tested, 4 children had an elevated lead level (>10 µg/dL).
Use of an ED verbal lead exposure screening tool identified children requiring additional follow-up testing. However, health department-referred children had poor follow-up, and few children were ultimately documented with elevated lead levels.
许多城市急诊科的人群特征往往反映了血清铅水平升高风险儿童的特征。我们评估了一项口头铅筛查计划对筛查到急诊科就诊的高危儿童的有效性。
对居住在2个目标县、年龄在9个月至6岁、到中西部一所城市学术急诊科就诊的儿童进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究。排除那些之前有铅水平检测结果、参加了需要进行铅检测的项目或病情不稳定的儿童。对所有符合条件儿童的家长进行了一项经过验证的包含6个问题的口头调查,并将结果记录在患者的电子病历中。筛查呈阳性的儿童被转介到当地卫生部门进行血铅检测。查阅卫生部门记录以了解后续就诊情况和血铅水平。
在研究期间,3513名儿童符合条件(平均年龄2.6岁;53.3%为男性),其中815名患者接受了筛查,209名(25.6%)筛查呈阳性。大多数筛查呈阳性的患者(71.8%)仅记录了1个肯定回答的问题,最常见的是表明他们居住在1978年以前建造的房屋中。在那些筛查呈阳性的儿童中,14.8%(31/209)在6个月内进行了血铅水平检测。在接受检测的儿童中,有4名儿童铅水平升高(>10μg/dL)。
使用急诊科口头铅暴露筛查工具可识别出需要进一步后续检测的儿童。然而,卫生部门转介的儿童后续跟进情况不佳,最终记录有铅水平升高的儿童很少。