• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙胶和根管封闭剂的去除:一项文献综述及对牙科学院当前实践的比较审计。

An removal of gutta-percha and root canal sealer: a literature review and an audit comparing current practice in dental schools.

作者信息

Good Melissa-L, McCammon Andrew

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Royal Hospitals, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BP, Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Dent Update. 2012 Dec;39(10):703-8. doi: 10.12968/denu.2012.39.10.703.

DOI:10.12968/denu.2012.39.10.703
PMID:23367635
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Endodontic failures often require non-surgical retreatment. The most common root canal obturating material is gutta-percha (GP), used in conjunction with various sealers. GP removal can be undertaken thermally and/or mechanically with or without solvents, however, no published guidelines exist. Following a literature review, an audit was undertaken comparing current endodontic practice in Belfast Dental School with the other dental schools across the UK and Republic of Ireland. From the findings, Belfast Dental School decided to introduce rotary files and chloroform to its Conservation Clinic with restrictions for use of the latter, although solvent use is not recommended in every case.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Efficiency in removing both gutta-percha and root canal sealer would maximize the ability to disinfect the root canal system and therefore increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.

摘要

未加标签

牙髓治疗失败通常需要进行非手术再治疗。最常用的根管充填材料是牙胶尖(GP),并与各种封闭剂联合使用。牙胶尖的去除可以通过热方法和/或机械方法进行,可使用或不使用溶剂,然而,目前尚无已发表的指南。在进行文献综述后,开展了一项审计,比较了贝尔法斯特牙科学院与英国和爱尔兰共和国其他牙科学院目前的牙髓治疗实践。根据研究结果,贝尔法斯特牙科学院决定在其保存诊所引入旋转锉和氯仿,并对氯仿的使用加以限制,尽管并非每种情况都推荐使用溶剂。

临床相关性

高效去除牙胶尖和根管封闭剂将最大限度地提高对根管系统进行消毒的能力,从而增加治疗成功的可能性。

相似文献

1
An removal of gutta-percha and root canal sealer: a literature review and an audit comparing current practice in dental schools.牙胶和根管封闭剂的去除:一项文献综述及对牙科学院当前实践的比较审计。
Dent Update. 2012 Dec;39(10):703-8. doi: 10.12968/denu.2012.39.10.703.
2
Efficacy of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from oval root canals: a micro-computed tomography study.ProTaper Universal 旋转根管再治疗系统去除椭圆形根管内牙胶的效果:一项微计算机断层扫描研究。
J Endod. 2012 Nov;38(11):1516-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
3
The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers.ProTaper Universal 机用镍钛器械用于移除几种根管封闭剂黏固的单根管牙胶尖的效果。
Int Endod J. 2012 Aug;45(8):756-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02032.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
4
Retreatment efficacy of hydraulic calcium silicate sealers used in single cone obturation.单根管充填中应用水门汀类根管封闭剂的再治疗疗效。
J Dent. 2020 Jul;98:103370. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103370. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Comparison of ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment systems in the removal of resin-based root canal obturation materials during retreatment.ProTaper和Mtwo再治疗系统在根管再治疗过程中去除树脂类根管充填材料的比较。
Aust Endod J. 2014 Apr;40(1):6-11. doi: 10.1111/aej.12011. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
6
Efficacy of Different Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Removing Gutta-percha during Root Canal Retreatment.不同镍钛器械在根管再治疗中去除牙胶的效果
J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):646-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
7
Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material.三种技术在去除根管充填材料方面的疗效。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Oct;74(8):721.
8
Efficacy of retreatment techniques for a resin-based root canal obturation material.树脂类根管充填材料再治疗技术的疗效
J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):341-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.010. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
9
Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals.ProTaper通用旋转再治疗系统从根管中去除牙胶的疗效。
Int Endod J. 2008 Apr;41(4):288-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01350.x. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
10
Endodontic 'Solutions'. Part 2: An audit comparing current practice in Belfast with UK and Republic of Ireland Dental Schools.牙髓病学“解决方案”。第2部分:贝尔法斯特当前实践与英国及爱尔兰共和国牙科学院的对比审计。
Dent Update. 2012 Jun;39(5):327-8, 330-2. doi: 10.12968/denu.2012.39.5.327.

引用本文的文献

1
Alveolar and gingival necrosis resulting from chloroform overextrusion beyond the root canal: A case report.根管外氯仿过度挤出导致的牙槽骨和牙龈坏死:一例报告。
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Oct 29;12(11):e9472. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9472. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Impact of different activation procedures on sodium hypochlorite penetration into dentinal tubules after endodontic retreatment via confocal laser scanning microscopy.通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察不同激活程序对根管再治疗后次氯酸钠进入牙本质小管的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):1103. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04891-6.
3
Prevalence of Apical Periodontitis in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and -analysis.
沙特阿拉伯根尖周炎的患病率:一项系统评价与分析
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1078-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.009. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
4
Comparing the softening effect of three gutta-percha solvents on different types of gutta-percha with different application durations.比较三种牙胶溶剂在不同应用时长下对不同类型牙胶的软化效果。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Feb;36(2):281-285. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.025. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
5
Effect of Chloroform Application on Roughness and Wettability of the Root Canal Walls in Endodontic Retreatment.氯仿应用于根管再治疗中对根管壁粗糙度和润湿性的影响。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2022 Sep;23(3):272-277. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.88414.1329.
6
Assessment of the Effectiveness of Supplementary Methods for Residual Filling Material Removal Using Micro-computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies.使用微计算机断层扫描评估残余填充材料去除的辅助方法的效果:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Endod J. 2022 Oct;7(3):178-186. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.22932.
7
Comparative evaluation of retreatability of bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS) and epoxy resin (AH Plus) sealer with two different retreatment files: An study.使用两种不同再治疗锉对生物陶瓷封闭剂(BioRoot RCS)和环氧树脂封闭剂(AH Plus)再治疗性能的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):88-93. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_657_20. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
8
Evaluation of the amount of remained sealer in the dentinal tubules following re-treatment with and without solvent.在有无溶剂的情况下进行再治疗后,评估牙本质小管中残留封闭剂的量。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;23(4):407-411. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_445_20. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
Comparative evaluation of retreatment techniques by using different file systems from oval-shaped canals.使用不同锉系统对椭圆形根管再治疗技术的比较评估。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):91-96. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_167_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
Retreatability of Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-Percha with Bioceramic, MTA and Resin-Based Sealers.使用牙胶与生物陶瓷、MTA及树脂类封闭剂充填的根管的再治疗性能
Iran Endod J. 2015;10(2):93-8. Epub 2015 Mar 18.