• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计一项自然实验,以评估国家医疗保健-社区伙伴关系预防 2 型糖尿病的效果。

Designing a natural experiment to evaluate a national health care-community partnership to prevent type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Dr, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E12. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120149.

DOI:10.5888/pcd10.120149
PMID:23369765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3562224/
Abstract

To address the growing incidence of type 2 diabetes in the United States, UnitedHealth Group, the YMCA of the USA, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have partnered to bring a group-based adaptation of the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention to a national scale. Researchers at Northwestern and Indiana universities are collaborating with these partners to design a robust evaluation of the reach, effectiveness, and costs of this natural experiment. We will employ a quasi-experimental, cluster-randomized study design and combine administrative, clinical, and programmatic data from existing sources to derive reliable, timely, and policy-relevant estimates of the program's impact and potential for sustainability. In this context, evaluation results will provide information about the unique role of a health care-community partnership to prevent type 2 diabetes.

摘要

为应对美国 2 型糖尿病发病率的不断上升,联合健康集团、美国基督教青年会和疾病控制与预防中心合作,将基于群体的糖尿病预防计划生活方式干预措施推广到全国范围。西北大学和印第安纳大学的研究人员正在与这些合作伙伴合作,对这一自然实验的覆盖范围、效果和成本进行全面评估。我们将采用准实验、群组随机设计,并结合现有来源的管理、临床和项目数据,得出该计划的影响和可持续性潜力的可靠、及时和与政策相关的估计。在这种情况下,评估结果将提供有关医疗保健-社区伙伴关系在预防 2 型糖尿病方面的独特作用的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4796/3562224/7b0ab6c04b6c/PCD-10-E12s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4796/3562224/7b0ab6c04b6c/PCD-10-E12s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4796/3562224/7b0ab6c04b6c/PCD-10-E12s01.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing a natural experiment to evaluate a national health care-community partnership to prevent type 2 diabetes.设计一项自然实验,以评估国家医疗保健-社区伙伴关系预防 2 型糖尿病的效果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E12. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120149.
2
The EPIC Kids Study: a randomized family-focused YMCA-based intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk youth.EPIC儿童研究:一项以家庭为重点、基于基督教青年会的随机干预措施,用于预防高危青少年患2型糖尿病。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 18;15:1253. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2595-3.
3
A coordinated national model for diabetes prevention: linking health systems to an evidence-based community program.协调一致的国家糖尿病预防模式:将卫生系统与基于证据的社区方案相联系。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4 Suppl 4):S301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.018.
4
Implementation of a group-based diabetes prevention program within a healthcare delivery system.在医疗服务系统中实施基于群组的糖尿病预防计划。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4569-0.
5
Rationale and design of a comparative effectiveness trial to prevent type 2 diabetes in mothers and children: the ENCOURAGE healthy families study.预防母婴2型糖尿病的比较效果试验的原理与设计:鼓励健康家庭研究
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jan;40:105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention Interventions Targeting High-risk Individuals and Whole Populations: A Systematic Review.针对高危个体和整个人群的糖尿病预防干预措施的成本效益:系统评价。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1593-1616. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0018.
7
A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program.基于群体的生活方式干预在中低收入国家预防糖尿病:喀拉拉邦糖尿病预防计划的实施评估。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 18;13(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0791-0.
8
A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: A cluster-randomized controlled trial of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program.印度的一种同伴支持生活方式干预措施预防 2 型糖尿病:喀拉拉邦糖尿病预防计划的一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 6;15(6):e1002575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002575. eCollection 2018 Jun.
9
Translating Knowledge into Action to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes: Medicare Expansion of the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention.将知识转化为行动,预防 2 型糖尿病:医疗保险扩大国家糖尿病预防计划生活方式干预。
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):172-196. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12443. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
10
Sowing the seeds for sustainable change: a community-based participatory research partnership for health promotion in Indiana, USA and its aftermath.为可持续变革播下种子:美国印第安纳州一个基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系促进健康及其后续影响。
Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21(4):293-300. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal025. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Type 2 Diabetes Second-Line Treatment Allocation Among Patients.患者中2型糖尿病的真实世界二线治疗分配
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 28:2025.03.26.25324631. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.26.25324631.
2
Introductory Overview of the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes 2.0 (NEXT-D2) Network: Examining the Impact of US Health Policies and Practices to Prevent Diabetes and Its Complications.糖尿病 2.0 自然试验转化网络(NEXT-D2 网络)简介:考察美国预防糖尿病及其并发症的卫生政策和实践的影响
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Feb 5;18(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-0977-5.
3
Medical Care Expenditures for Individuals with Prediabetes: The Potential Cost Savings in Reducing the Risk of Developing Diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
The 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS.生活方式干预或二甲双胍预防糖尿病的 10 年成本效益:DPP/DPPOS 的意向治疗分析。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):723-30. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1468.
2
How effective were lifestyle interventions in real-world settings that were modeled on the Diabetes Prevention Program?基于糖尿病预防计划模型的现实环境中,生活方式干预的效果如何?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jan;31(1):67-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1009.
3
An IV for the RCT: using instrumental variables to adjust for treatment contamination in randomised controlled trials.
糖尿病前期个体的医疗保健支出:降低患糖尿病风险可能节省的成本。
Popul Health Manag. 2017 Oct;20(5):389-396. doi: 10.1089/pop.2016.0134. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
4
National Strategies to Decrease the Burden of Diabetes and Its Complications.减轻糖尿病及其并发症负担的国家战略。
Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Sep;15(9):65. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0637-y.
5
Evaluating diabetes health policies using natural experiments: the natural experiments for translation in diabetes study.利用自然实验评估糖尿病健康政策:糖尿病研究中的转化自然实验
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jun;48(6):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.010.
6
Fostering multiple healthy lifestyle behaviors for primary prevention of cancer.培养多种健康生活方式行为以进行癌症一级预防。
Am Psychol. 2015 Feb-Mar;70(2):75-90. doi: 10.1037/a0038806.
7
Translating evidence into population health improvement: strategies and barriers.将证据转化为人群健康改善:策略与障碍
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:463-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082214-110901. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Short and long-term lifestyle coaching approaches used to address diverse participant barriers to weight loss and physical activity adherence.用于解决不同参与者在减肥和坚持体育活动方面障碍的短期和长期生活方式指导方法。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Feb 12;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-16.
9
Type 2 diabetes family histories, body composition and fasting glucose levels: a cross-section analysis in healthy sedentary male and female.2型糖尿病家族史、身体成分与空腹血糖水平:健康久坐男性和女性的横断面分析
Iran J Public Health. 2013 Jul 1;42(7):681-90. eCollection 2013.
RCT 的静脉注射:使用工具变量调整随机对照试验中的治疗污染。
BMJ. 2010 May 4;340:c2073. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2073.
4
Prevention of type 2 diabetes: risk status, clinic, and community.预防 2 型糖尿病:风险状况、临床和社区。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Feb;25(2):154-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1148-9. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
5
Changes in health state utilities with changes in body mass in the Diabetes Prevention Program.在糖尿病预防计划中,随着体重的变化,健康状态效用的变化。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Dec;17(12):2176-81. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.114. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
6
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into the community. The DEPLOY Pilot Study.将糖尿病预防计划推广至社区。DEPLOY试点研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Oct;35(4):357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.035.
7
Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification.糖尿病患者为何未达到推荐的风险因素目标?是依从性差还是缺乏强化治疗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):588-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0554-8. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
Contamination in trials of educational interventions.教育干预试验中的污染问题。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Oct;11(43):iii, ix-107. doi: 10.3310/hta11430.
9
Adapting the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for delivery in the community: the YMCA model.调整糖尿病预防计划的生活方式干预措施以便在社区实施:基督教青年会模式。
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Jan-Feb;33(1):69, 74-5, 77-8. doi: 10.1177/0145721706297743.
10
Dynamic wait-listed designs for randomized trials: new designs for prevention of youth suicide.随机试验的动态候补名单设计:预防青少年自杀的新设计
Clin Trials. 2006;3(3):259-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn152oa.