Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Clin J Pain. 2013 Aug;29(8):681-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182757720.
Catastrophizing is a coping style linked to poorer patient outcomes. Little attention has focused on the parent-adolescent dyad and catastrophizing as a shared coping style. The purpose of this study was to: (1) examine the effects of adolescent and parent pain catastrophizing on adolescent functioning and (2) explore concordance in catastrophizing in parent-adolescent dyads, with equal interest in outcomes of dyads with discordant coping styles.
Pain intensity, catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, quality of life, and pain behaviors were assessed in adolescents (ages 11 to 17) presenting to a pediatric chronic pain clinic (N=240).
Significant correlations between (1) parent and adolescent catastrophizing; (2) catastrophizing and pain behaviors; and (3) catastrophizing and adolescent outcomes were found. Parents and adolescents were classified into concordant or discordant dyads based on catastrophizing with a majority of dyads (>70%) showing concordant coping styles. Among discordant dyads, functional disability and depressive symptoms were significantly higher in a dyad with a high catastrophizing adolescent and low catastrophizing parent.
Results provide further support for catastrophizing being a maladaptive coping strategy for adolescents with pain and their parents. Greater adolescent catastrophizing was related to increased pain behaviors and poorer adolescent functioning. Parent catastrophizing also seems related to poorer adolescent outcomes, and most parent-adolescent dyads showed concordance in use of catastrophizing, which may suggest a shared tendency for adaptive or maladaptive styles of coping with pain. Future research should investigate pain coping at a dyadic or family level to explore how family coping styles magnify distress and disability or buffer adolescents from such problems.
灾难化是一种与较差的患者结局相关的应对方式。很少关注父母-青少年对子代和灾难化作为一种共同应对方式。本研究的目的是:(1)研究青少年和父母的疼痛灾难化对青少年功能的影响;(2)探讨父母-青少年对子代中灾难化的一致性,对具有不同应对方式的对子代的结局具有同等的兴趣。
对到儿科慢性疼痛诊所就诊的青少年(年龄 11 至 17 岁)(N=240)进行疼痛强度、灾难化、抑郁症状、生活质量和疼痛行为评估。
发现了(1)父母和青少年灾难化之间的显著相关性;(2)灾难化与疼痛行为之间的相关性;(3)灾难化与青少年结局之间的相关性。根据灾难化将父母和青少年分为一致或不一致的对子,大多数对子(>70%)显示出一致的应对方式。在不一致的对子中,具有高灾难化青少年和低灾难化父母的对子的功能障碍和抑郁症状显著更高。
结果进一步支持灾难化是青少年疼痛及其父母的一种适应不良的应对策略。青少年的灾难化程度越高,疼痛行为越多,青少年的功能越差。父母的灾难化似乎也与青少年的不良结局有关,大多数父母-青少年对子代都表现出灾难化的一致性,这可能表明他们具有共同的适应或适应不良的疼痛应对方式倾向。未来的研究应在双体或家庭层面上研究疼痛应对方式,以探讨家庭应对方式如何放大痛苦和残疾,或缓冲青少年免受这些问题的影响。