Mycology Reference Centre, Department of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;32(7):923-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1827-7. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
Assessment of the significance of isolation of Aspergillus sp. from respiratory culture in patients who are not neutropenic is a continuing problem in respiratory medicine. In recent years a number of criteria for defining patients with invasive or chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in this group have been proposed. This study sought to assess the value of three sets of these criteria in distinguishing between colonisation and aspergillosis requiring therapy when applied retrospectively to 121 patients with positive sputum or BAL culture for Aspergillus sp. Two patients (1.6%) were identified as having proven or probable aspergillosis by the EORTC criteria, two different patients fulfilled the criteria for invasive aspergillosis in the 62 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.2%), and yet another two different patients met the criteria for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (1.6%). It is suggested that difficulties in the application of some of these criteria may prevent the accurate diagnosis of aspergillosis in the non-neutropenic patient setting.
非中性粒细胞减少患者的呼吸道培养中分离出曲霉菌属的意义评估一直是呼吸医学中的一个问题。近年来,已经提出了一些定义此类患者侵袭性或慢性肺曲霉病的标准。本研究旨在评估将这三组标准应用于 121 例曲霉菌属痰或 BAL 培养阳性的患者时,在回顾性评估时区分定植和需要治疗的曲霉病的价值。根据 EORTC 标准,有两名患者(1.6%)被确定为有明确或可能的曲霉病,在 62 例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,有两名不同的患者符合侵袭性曲霉病的标准(3.2%),另有两名不同的患者符合慢性肺曲霉病的标准(1.6%)。这些标准中的一些标准在应用上存在困难,可能会导致非中性粒细胞减少患者中曲霉病的诊断不准确。