School of Medicine, Cardiff University, The Pharma Research Centre, Cardiff MediCentre, Cardiff CF14 4UJ, United Kingdom.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb;98(2):668-77. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3042. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
The safety of insulin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has recently undergone scrutiny.
The objective of the study was to characterize the risk of adverse events associated with glucose-lowering therapies in people with T2DM.
This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the UK General Practice Research Database, 2000-2010.
Patients comprised 84 622 primary care patients with T2DM treated with one of five glucose-lowering regimens: metformin monotherapy, sulfonylurea monotherapy, insulin monotherapy, metformin plus sulfonylurea combination therapy, and insulin plus metformin combination therapy. There were 105 123 exposure periods.
The risk of the first major adverse cardiac event, first cancer, or mortality was measured. Secondary outcomes included these individual constituents and microvascular complications.
In the same model, and using metformin monotherapy as the referent, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for the primary end point was significantly increased for sulfonylurea monotherapy (1.436, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.354-1.523), insulin monotherapy (1.808, 95% CI 1.630-2.005), and insulin plus metformin (1.309, 95% CI 1.150-1.491). In glycosylated hemoglobin/morbidity subgroups, patients treated with insulin monotherapy had aHRs for the primary outcome ranging from 1.469 (95% CI 0.978-2.206) to 2.644 (95% CI 1.896-3.687). For all secondary outcomes, insulin monotherapy had increased aHRs: myocardial infarction (1.954, 95% CI 1.479-2.583), major adverse cardiac events (1.736, 95% CI 1.441-2.092), stroke (1.432, 95% CI 1.159-1.771), renal complications (3.504, 95% CI 2.718-4.518), neuropathy (2.146, 95% CI 1.832-2.514), eye complications (1.171, 95% CI 1.057-1.298), cancer (1.437, 95% CI 1.234-1.674), or all-cause mortality (2.197, 95% CI 1.983-2.434). When compared directly, aHRs were higher for insulin monotherapy vs all other regimens for the primary end point and all-cause mortality.
In people with T2DM, exogenous insulin therapy was associated with an increased risk of diabetes-related complications, cancer, and all-cause mortality. Differences in baseline characteristics between treatment groups should be considered when interpreting these results.
胰岛素在 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)治疗中的安全性最近受到了审查。
本研究旨在描述 T2DM 患者使用降糖治疗与不良事件风险的相关性。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了英国普通实践研究数据库 2000-2010 年的数据。
共纳入 84622 例接受五种降糖方案之一治疗的 T2DM 初级保健患者:二甲双胍单药治疗、磺酰脲类单药治疗、胰岛素单药治疗、二甲双胍加磺酰脲类联合治疗和胰岛素加二甲双胍联合治疗。共涉及 105123 个暴露期。
测量了首次主要不良心脏事件、首次癌症或死亡率的风险。次要结局包括这些单独的组成部分和微血管并发症。
在相同模型中,以二甲双胍单药治疗为参照,磺酰脲类单药治疗(1.436,95%置信区间[CI]1.354-1.523)、胰岛素单药治疗(1.808,95%CI1.630-2.005)和胰岛素加二甲双胍(1.309,95%CI1.150-1.491)的主要终点风险比(aHR)显著增加。在糖化血红蛋白/发病率亚组中,接受胰岛素单药治疗的患者的主要结局 aHR 范围为 1.469(95%CI0.978-2.206)至 2.644(95%CI1.896-3.687)。对于所有次要结局,胰岛素单药治疗的 aHR 均升高:心肌梗死(1.954,95%CI1.479-2.583)、主要不良心脏事件(1.736,95%CI1.441-2.092)、中风(1.432,95%CI1.159-1.771)、肾脏并发症(3.504,95%CI2.718-4.518)、神经病变(2.146,95%CI1.832-2.514)、眼病(1.171,95%CI1.057-1.298)、癌症(1.437,95%CI1.234-1.674)或全因死亡率(2.197,95%CI1.983-2.434)。当直接比较时,胰岛素单药治疗与所有其他方案相比,主要终点和全因死亡率的 aHR 更高。
在 T2DM 患者中,外源性胰岛素治疗与糖尿病相关并发症、癌症和全因死亡率的风险增加相关。在解释这些结果时,应考虑治疗组之间的基线特征差异。