Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Inge Lehmanns vej 7, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Jul 6;19(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01078-5.
In randomised clinical trials, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors reduced cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular risk, as compared to standard care. However, data comparing these agents in patients with T2D who are at moderate risk is sparse.
From Danish national registries, we included patients with T2D previously on metformin monotherapy, who started an additional glucose-lowering agent [GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2 inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, sulfonylurea (SU), or insulin] in the period 2010-2016. Patients with a history of cardiovascular events [heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke] were excluded. Patients were followed for up to 2 years. Cause-specific adjusted Cox regression models were used to compare the risk of hospitalisation for HF, a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (MI, stroke or cardiovascular death), and all-cause mortality for each add-on therapy. Patients who initiated DPP-4 inhibitors were used as reference.
The study included 46,986 T2D patients with a median age of 61 years and of which 59% were male. The median duration of metformin monotherapy prior to study inclusion was 5.3 years. Add-on therapy was distributed as follows: 13,148 (28%) GLP-1 RAs, 2343 (5%) SGLT-2 inhibitors, 15,426 (33%) DPP-4 inhibitors, 8917 (19%) SUs, and 7152 (15%) insulin. During follow-up, 623 (1.3%, range 0.8-2.1%) patients were hospitalised for HF-hazard ratios (HR) were 1.11 (95% CI 0.89-1.39) for GLP-1 RA, 0.84 (0.52-1.36) for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 0.98 (0.77-1.26) for SU and 1.54 (1.25-1.91) for insulin. The composite MACE endpoint occurred in 1196 (2.5%, range 1.5-3.6%) patients, yielding HRs of 0.82 (0.69-0.97) for GLP-1 RAs, 0.79 (0.56-1.12) for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 1.22 (1.03-1.49) for SU and 1.23 (1.07-1.47) for insulin. 1865 (3.9%, range 1.9-9.0%) died from any cause during follow-up. HRs for all-cause mortality were 0.91 (0.78-1.05) for GLP-1 RAs, 0.79 (0.58-1.07) for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 1.13 (0.99-1.31) for SU and 2.33 (2.08-2.61) for insulin.
In a nationwide cohort of metformin-treated T2D patients and no history of cardiovascular events, the addition of either GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2 inhibitor to metformin treatment was associated with a similar risk of hospitalisation for HF and death, and a lower risk of MACE for GLP-1 RA when compared with add-on DPP-4 inhibitors. By contrast, initiation of treatment with SU and insulin were associated with a higher risk of MACE. Additionally, insulin was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for HF.
在随机临床试验中,与标准治疗相比,胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT-2)抑制剂可降低 2 型糖尿病(T2D)高危患者的心血管事件。然而,在心血管风险中度的 T2D 患者中比较这些药物的数据很少。
我们从丹麦国家登记处纳入了先前接受二甲双胍单药治疗的 T2D 患者,这些患者在 2010-2016 年期间开始使用额外的降糖药物[GLP-1 RA、SGLT-2 抑制剂、二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂、磺酰脲(SU)或胰岛素]。排除有心血管事件(心力衰竭[HF]、心肌梗死[MI]或中风)病史的患者。对患者进行了长达 2 年的随访。使用特定于病因的调整 Cox 回归模型比较每种附加治疗的 HF 住院、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(MI、中风或心血管死亡)复合终点和全因死亡率的风险。以起始 DPP-4 抑制剂的患者为参照。
这项研究纳入了 46986 名 T2D 患者,中位年龄 61 岁,其中 59%为男性。在研究纳入前,接受二甲双胍单药治疗的中位时间为 5.3 年。附加治疗的分布如下:GLP-1 RAs 13148 例(28%),SGLT-2 抑制剂 2343 例(5%),DPP-4 抑制剂 15426 例(33%),SU 8917 例(19%)和胰岛素 7152 例(15%)。在随访期间,有 623 名(1.3%,范围 0.8-2.1%)患者因 HF 住院,HR 为 GLP-1 RA 1.11(95%CI 0.89-1.39),SGLT-2 抑制剂 0.84(0.52-1.36),SU 0.98(0.77-1.26)和胰岛素 1.54(1.25-1.91)。复合 MACE 终点发生在 1196 名(2.5%,范围 1.5-3.6%)患者中,HR 为 GLP-1 RA 0.82(0.69-0.97),SGLT-2 抑制剂 0.79(0.56-1.12),SU 1.22(1.03-1.49)和胰岛素 1.23(1.07-1.47)。1865 名(3.9%,范围 1.9-9.0%)患者因任何原因死亡。全因死亡率的 HR 为 GLP-1 RA 0.91(0.78-1.05),SGLT-2 抑制剂 0.79(0.58-1.07),SU 1.13(0.99-1.31)和胰岛素 2.33(2.08-2.61)。
在一项纳入无心血管事件的二甲双胍治疗的 T2D 患者的全国性队列研究中,与起始 DPP-4 抑制剂相比,GLP-1 RA 或 SGLT-2 抑制剂加用二甲双胍治疗与 HF 住院和死亡风险相似,GLP-1 RA 治疗的 MACE 风险降低。相比之下,起始 SU 和胰岛素治疗与 MACE 风险升高相关。此外,胰岛素与全因死亡率和 HF 住院风险增加相关。