Raji S Hamid, Ghorbanipour Reza, Majdzade Fateme
Torabinejad Dental Research Center and Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011 Dec;8(Suppl 1):S94-9.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of an antimicrobial and fluoride-releasing self-etch primer (clearfil protect bond) and compare it with transbond plus self-etch primer and conventional acid etching and priming system.
Forty-eight extracted human premolars were divided randomly to three groups. In group 1, the teeth were bonded with conventional acid etching and priming method. In group 2, the teeth were bonded with clearfil protect bond self-etch primer, and transbond plus self-etch primer was used to bond the teeth in group 3. The samples were stored in 37°C distilled water and thermocycled. Then, the SBS of the sample was evaluated with Zwick testing machine. Descriptive statistics and the analysis of variances (ANOVA) and Tukey's test and Kruskal-Wallis were used to analyze the data.
The results of the ANOVA showed that the mean of group 3 was significantly lower than that of other groups. Most of the sample showed a pattern of failure within the adhesive resin.
The shear bond strength of clearfil protect bond and transbond plus self-etch primer was enough for bonding the orthodontic brackets. The mode of failure of bonded brackets with these two self-etch primers is safe for enamel.
本研究的目的是评估一种抗菌且能释放氟的自酸蚀底漆(Clearfil Protect Bond)的剪切粘结强度,并将其与Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆以及传统酸蚀和底漆系统进行比较。
将48颗拔除的人类前磨牙随机分为三组。第1组,采用传统酸蚀和底漆方法粘结牙齿。第2组,使用Clearfil Protect Bond自酸蚀底漆粘结牙齿,第3组则使用Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆粘结牙齿。样本储存在37°C蒸馏水中并进行热循环处理。然后,使用Zwick测试机评估样本的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。采用描述性统计、方差分析(ANOVA)、Tukey检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行分析。
方差分析结果显示,第3组的平均值显著低于其他组。大多数样本在粘结树脂内呈现出失败模式。
Clearfil Protect Bond和Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆的剪切粘结强度足以用于粘结正畸托槽。使用这两种自酸蚀底漆粘结托槽的失败模式对牙釉质是安全的。